It's clearly going to take the tech industry a while to understand that the "AI" brand is well and truly toxic

If you have a software or feature, sell it on what it does for people. If it's actually useful, then calling it "AI" will just make people assume it's yet another money-grabbing con.

Especially if you aren't using an LLM or diffusion model and instead are just using a non-generative ML model. Why willingly adopt all that negative baggage when you don't have to?

@baldur

"It's clearly going to take the tech industry a while"

It really shouldn't, though. We have plenty of studies and other evidence.

https://stefanbohacek.com/blog/on-generative-ai/#consumer-sentiment

I wonder if this is denial, or maybe they just don't care?

On generative AI and LLMs | Stefan Bohacek

Generative AI is anti-worker, anti-environment, and doesn't even work all that well.

@stefan @baldur it’s actually “capitalists are as sentient as the alphabet soup cans they create”