@ceejbot But also: _this is why we design processes and contexts to minimize harms_.
Unfortunately that means now _re_designing a bunch of them.
@aredridel @ceejbot fundamentally this _is_ the difference between a good programmer and a bad programmer.
a good programmer will think "I am not a good programmer. because of this, I will design for safety, because I will make mistakes."
a bad programmer thinks that they can try a little harder and be safe that way
@glyph @aredridel @ceejbot I think a lot of people are working on the assumption that mistakes aren't as costly anymore.
You won't have to live with the consequences very long and you can just rewrite everything if the technical decisions you make end up being wrong.
This doesn't hold for genuine safety issues, like things affecting the privacy and security of your users, but industry was already caring about those things pretty reluctantly.
@glyph @aredridel @ceejbot given the choice of being out competed by someone using AI and losing all your customers data because you used AI the choice if obvious.
There are provably no consequences for the latter.
You can calculate exactly how much a year of free credit monitoring for all your users will cost.