extending an enormous "bruh" to the people who are making a spreadsheet of all the mainstream programming languages and tools that you "shouldn't use" because they have some tests written by Claude that probably wouldn't have been written without it (ie. it increases correctness). cmon man.

yes there are people writing slop but almost all people who give a shit and work on production systems don't (and are probably busy getting their day ruined by jackasses wielding chatbots even if they do use them themselves).

leftists gobble up purity politics better than devout Catholics.

@leftpaddotpy my perspective has changed quite a lot since I've listened to https://securitycryptographywhatever.com/2026/03/25/ai-bug-finding/. These are people who know a thing or two about security and you can listen to them trying to understand the consequences of LLMs on the field. Afterwards I don't feel any less annoyed by AI, just more like LLM based security analysis will be needed to defend against those abusing these tools
AI Finds Vulns You Can’t With Nicholas Carlini

Returning champion Nicholas Carlini comes back to talk about using Claude for vulnerability research, and the current vulnpocalypse. It’s all very high-brow ...