Mastodawn

Not sure this is still being practiced here, but just in case: Would anyone be able to send me this paper? I don't have access, unfortunately:

Andalas, Eggy Fajar, Sudibyo Sudibyo, and Sri Ratna Saktimulya. “Computational Method in Literary Studies.” The International Journal of Critical Cultural Studies, ahead of print, March 13, 2026. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0055/cgp/a248

My email is: [email protected]

#ICanHazPDF

Show thread

@frueheneuzeit 1d ago

@christof this looks a bit shady: no peer review, no clearly indicated publisher, no editors. I don't want to convince you that it's not worth the trouble, but my gut feeling tells me that reading this stuff may leave you disappointed.

Show thread

Christof Schöch 1d ago

@stefan_hessbrueggen

You are probably right. I mean, I know from the abstract that I am going to be disappointed, because they used Scopus data, where e.g. @jcls is not represented, afaik, and limited themselves to English-language sources. The conclusions formulated in the abstract likely follow from those choices, at least to some extent.

But of course I want to be fair and read the paper before drawing any conclusions.

Show thread

@frueheneuzeit

@christof @jcls that's the good thing about philosophy: you need to earn the right to be read (in the eyes of reviewers).