Just a reminder: it's a huge #accessibility fail to adopt slop in your #OpenSource project.
If you enforce an LLM ban, everyone can contribute to your project.
If you allow LLM-based generation, some people can no longer contribute to your project, and it may be forked by the community.
So please, do not allow slop in your project. Keep it accessible for all humans. Thank you! 🙏
...what? How is the code no longer "accessible"?
I think you're misunderstanding that "accessibility" is some kind of nice to have quality metric? Anyway, I don't understand, please elaborate.
@bmaxv I'm talking about the development process of the codebase being accessible.
Imagine a cafeteria which doesn't accommodate people with food allergies, or religious dietary requirements. That is an accessibility issue.
Similarly, an OSS project which adopts agentic coding workflows disenfranchises people who are unable to or unwilling to use agentic coding workflows (due to any number of factors from financial to technical to moral).
Jared White (ResistanceNet ✊)
bmaxv