Announcing ARC-AGI-3 - An benchmark that tests if AI can explore, learn, and adapt in unfamiliar situations. Humans score 100%. Frontier AI scores 0.26%.

https://lemmy.ca/post/62420870

Announcing ARC-AGI-3 - An benchmark that tests if AI can explore, learn, and adapt in unfamiliar situations. Humans score 100%. Frontier AI scores 0.26%. - Lemmy.ca

The ARC Prize organization designs benchmarks which are specifically crafted to demonstrate tasks that humans complete easily, but are difficult for AIs like LLMs, “Reasoning” models, and Agentic frameworks. > ARC-AGI-3 is the first fully interactive benchmark in the ARC-AGI series. ARC-AGI-3 represents hundreds of original turn-based environments, each handcrafted by a team of human game designers. There are no instructions, no rules, and no stated goals. To succeed, an AI agent must explore each environment on its own, figure out how it works, discover what winning looks like, and carry what it learns forward across increasingly difficult levels. > > Previous ARC-AGI benchmarks predicted and tracked major AI breakthroughs, from reasoning models to coding agents. ARC-AGI-3 points to what’s next: the gap between AI that can follow instructions and AI that can genuinely explore, learn, and adapt in unfamiliar situations. You can try the tasks yourself here: https://arcprize.org/arc-agi/3 [https://arcprize.org/arc-agi/3] Here is the current leaderboard for ARC-AGI 3, using state of the art models - OpenAI GPT-5.4 High - 0.3% success rate at $5.2K - Google Gemini 3.1 Pro - 0.2% success rate at $2.2K - Anthropic Opus 4.6 Max - 0.2% success rate at $8.9K - xAI Grok 4.20 Reasoning - 0.0% success rate $3.8K. ARC-AGI 3 Leaderboard [https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/c7521941-7eac-46f4-98de-876bcf99220c.png] (Logarithmic cost on the horizontal axis) https://arcprize.org/leaderboard [https://arcprize.org/leaderboard]

Biased study. Take any average person off the streets and shove this thing in their face. That 100% notion will go down fast.
Pretty defensive there. It’s not even a study
If it studies something, it’s a study. If you feel defensiveness, you consider aggression. If you feel bias in one way, someone can feel bias in another way. If there’s an action, there’s a reaction.

If you feel defensiveness, you consider aggression.

Aggression as in calling something biased without providing evidence?

As in assuming you are starting with an unbiased point of view.
Of course we all have our biases. But what to do with that lesson? It can be a convenient response whenever someone disagrees with us. But it can also serve as a powerful motivation to find some common ground against all odds. The universe is chaotic. Language is illogical. Yet sometimes we find stuff we can agree on. Isn’t that beautiful?

If there’s an action, there’s a reaction.

Sort of like how when people outsource all their critical thinking to AI, their ability for critical thinking atrophies?

I’m studying these comments, now I am a study
I salute your dedication to science. 🫡