theindieman

Order Granting Preliminary Injunction – Anthropic vs. U.S. Department of War [pdf]

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465515/gov.uscourts.cand.465515.134.0.pdf

Mar 26 at 11:11pmWeb
Show threadtheindieman1d ago

Here’s the Preliminary Injunction Order. Essentially a total victory for Anthropic, but SCOTUS will certainly have the final say.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.46...

Show threadmistrial91d ago

great! this is the accompanying opinion

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.46...

Show threaddrgo1d ago
"Nothing in the governing statute supports the Orwellian notion that an American company may be branded a potential adversary and saboteur of the U.S. for expressing disagreement with the government." Well.. we live in Orwellian times.
Show threadesbranson1d ago
Yes, more of this. (Direct, timely links to court dockets and documents on US Article III court cases.)
Show threaddroidjj1d ago
Agreed! And shout-out to the people at CourtListener (the site hosting this PDF), who make millions of US court documents freely available to the public.
Show threadceejayoz1d ago

> In light of Anthropic’s showing on the merits, and the lack of evidence of harm to Defendants, the Court sets a nominal bond of $100.

That must have been a bit of a goofy check to write.

Show threadzrail1d ago
(not a lawyer) I _think_ this is a result of Trump v CASA, where the Supreme Court determined that preliminary injunctions and TROs without a bond of some sort (which until then were fairly common) were invalid and unenforceable.