Seems we have confirmation this 'Josh Law' guy is an openclaw bot - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/ae7dc[email protected]/

As I said in https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1e982055-[email protected]/ :

"I feel that LLMs are not like any other tools but in fact represent
something entirely new in that you can end-to-end send patches using this
tooling with little to no knowledge and the asymmetry between maintainer
resource and the possible slurry of submissions that might arise makes this
very significantly different.

I know Linus had the cute interpretation of it 'just being another tool'
but never before have people been able to do this."

Of course Linus slapped me down with his 'just more tooling' take which was gleefully reported on by the press (e.g. https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/08/linus_versus_llms_ai_slop_docs/ )

I'll let you decide whether these are 'just like any other tool' or not.

BTW 'Josh Law' more than doubled his sent emails in a week or 2 to 370+.

Of course I'm sure coccinelle has that feature and I just wasn't aware 👀

Re: [PATCH] mm/damon: introduce DAMON-based NUMA memory tiering module - Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)

@ljs Question is whether we should start reverting all their commits (~40), because of non-trusted DCO certificate.

@krzk I'd be pretty fine with that tbh haha and that's a good point re: DCO.

It's all trivia except for this latest series which we have nackity nacked anyway, so it's no great loss

@krzk I honestly think at this stage it's actually unproductive to respond to him/her/it, the person behind it is probably getting off on the responses/drama around this
@ljs Yes, except that one about wrapping I am not going to continue the dialogue. When people ask someone 20 times to wrap email and someone still does not do it, probably that person enjoys annoying the community and just sits with the popcorn watching emails...

@krzk yeah exactly, it's all bullshit, this is intentional clearly.

The AI assessment doesn't match his b.s. claim only some stuff was AI.

It was all AI and most likely using openclaw... but he/she/it's worn out its welcome...

@krzk and yeah I just broke my own rule :P but wanted to do 1 last call out, >/dev/null on replying to this entity again :P