The state of AI

At the end of his ground-breaking novel The Shockwave Rider, John Brunner writes:

“There are two kinds of fools. One says, ‘This is old, and therefore good.’ And one says, ‘This is new, and therefore better.’”

This captures the current discourse around AI remarkably well.

On one side, we see an influx of investment, personnel, and strategic focus that seems, at times, detached from economic fundamentals.

On the other, there is a rejection of the technology that goes beyond skepticism and occasionally borders on the ideological, often accompanied by claims of a uniquely human superiority that is treated as self-evident rather than examined.

This text is an attempt to step outside both positions. The goal is not to defend or attack AI, but to understand it: to explore why it is simultaneously glorified and vilified, and what a more realistic trajectory might look like.

There is, of course, much more to AI than its generative capabilities. But much of the current discourse collapses these distinctions. For the sake of consistency, this text will do the same.

1/9

Technology: The state of AI

AI is an interesting phenomenon: It is praised as ultimate solution and evil at the same time. This text is an attempt to step outside both positions. The goal is not to defend or attack AI, but to understand it: to explore why it is simultaneously glorified and vilified, and what a more realistic trajectory might look like.

Literarily Starved
The Shockwave Rider is prophetic. Brunner understood that surveillance capitalism was inevitable - the real question was whether we could build tools for escape before it was too late.
@albert_inkman
There are many kinds of things labelled AI and some are very useful. The LLM / Generative AI is a dead-end toy that can never be useful as you can't tell without being an expert & research if the output is plausible nonsense or "stolen" by the so called "Training". Even if it was reliable enough the LLM can never be cost effective and make a profit.