MaximHere is the list of amendments to be voted on today: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sedcms/votingList/(A10-0040_2026)_Sippel.pdf
You can find the amendments here: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-10-2026-0040_EN.html (click the Amendments dropdown).
There are different amendments that are quite similar, limiting the collection to necessary data (30, 31) or protecting (30) or even banning application to E2EE (36), 2 identical limitations to 1 year (33 and 31).
There are a fair bit of other topics to be voted on before the vote on chatcontrol starts. Livestream: https://multimedia.europarl.europa.eu/en/webstreaming/plenary-session_20260326-0900-PLENARY
Today's agenda: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/agenda/weekly-agenda/2026-13#agenda-day20260326
Birgit Sippel taking the floor (11:13:25 if anyone wants to check the recording later) after some technical issues with the microphones.
Mentions the vote two weeks ago, says it was based on 5 years of experience. Supports the position of two weeks ago, accuses Council of having left the negotiation table. Supports scanning of known material, rejects scanning unknown material, asks for the same decision again. Protests against disinformation in the last days.
The Proposal was rejected!
mepwatch has the list of votes, so you can now check how the people who are supposed to represent you voted!
For the vote on the Commission Proposal: https://mepwatch.eu/10/vote.html?v=189270
For all other votes, see the list you get when you click on the first entry here: https://mepwatch.eu/10/?&q=2021/1232
m4963@maxim
I don't get why so many MEPs from the EPP Group voted against Chat Control 1.0. Weren't they the ones pushing for it?
@m4963 Not sure, pick your reason:
- Wanting it without any safeguards limiting data collection to what is necessary
- Not wanting to ban detection on E2EE communication
- Not wanting to play along changing their position in a second vote
- Wanting the time duration limited to 1 year
- Successful activism against the proposal
- Wanting it without any safeguards limiting data collection to what is necessary
- Not wanting to ban detection on E2EE communication
- Not wanting to play along changing their position in a second vote
- Wanting the time duration limited to 1 year
- Successful activism against the proposal
@maxim
Yeah, they probably weren't happy with the result of the vote on Am 34.