Here is the list of amendments to be voted on today: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sedcms/votingList/(A10-0040_2026)_Sippel.pdf
You can find the amendments here: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-10-2026-0040_EN.html (click the Amendments dropdown).
There are different amendments that are quite similar, limiting the collection to necessary data (30, 31) or protecting (30) or even banning application to E2EE (36), 2 identical limitations to 1 year (33 and 31).

#chatcontrol #Chatkontrolle #privacy

There are a fair bit of other topics to be voted on before the vote on chatcontrol starts. Livestream: https://multimedia.europarl.europa.eu/en/webstreaming/plenary-session_20260326-0900-PLENARY

Today's agenda: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/agenda/weekly-agenda/2026-13#agenda-day20260326

Plenary session - Multimedia Centre

The multimedia platform of the European Parliament is the official public available repository of the media production of the Secretariat of the European Parliament, managed by the Directorate-General for Communication (DG COMM).

Multimedia Centre

Birgit Sippel taking the floor (11:13:25 if anyone wants to check the recording later) after some technical issues with the microphones.

Mentions the vote two weeks ago, says it was based on 5 years of experience. Supports the position of two weeks ago, accuses Council of having left the negotiation table. Supports scanning of known material, rejects scanning unknown material, asks for the same decision again. Protests against disinformation in the last days.

The Proposal was rejected!

#chatcontrol #Chatkontrolle #privacy

Here's the votes on the Comission Proposal. In favor 228. Against: 311. No extension of chatcontrol 1.0 for now, meaning the legislation will expire soon by April 3rd, making it effectively illegal to keep scanning voluntarily!
@maxim Where can we see the detailed vote results of each MEP?

@titaniumbiscuit mepwatch has these since a few minutes apparently :)

Here is the vote on the Commission proposal:

https://mepwatch.eu/10/vote.html?v=189270

@maxim On that page it shows that Birgit Sippel did vote *for* the proposal. Isn't that strange given her rejection of the Commission's approach in her speech earlier? Or is there something I'm misunderstanding?

#chatcontrol

@titaniumbiscuit It seems the parliament's position was quite close to the previous one.

The amendments for limiting to strictly necessary data & a ban on scanning of E2EE communication were re-approved, the difference would have been that the scanning wouldn't have necessarily been targeted & the duration would've been 2 years (Commission proposal) instead of 1 year (previous vote).

She might've felt the difference to be too small for her to change her vote to reject.