Data Finds Republicans are Obsessed with Searching for Transgender Porn

https://lemdro.id/post/38082171

They can’t get off if it’s mainstream, they need their fetishes to be taboo, and preferably illegal. So, they make it illegal, then rub themselves raw over it.
This is, upsettingly, probably true for a significant portion of them.

en.wiktionary.org/…/forbidden_fruit_is_the_sweete…

Proverb

forbidden fruit is the sweetest

  • Forbidden things seem more appealing; people desire things more if (or, in some way, because) they can’t have them.
  • forbidden fruit is the sweetest - Wiktionary, the free dictionary

    Wiktionary
    Also curiousity due to lack of sexual education.
    Huh, and here I thought we didn’t like any of the same things.
    You see the performers as people. They see the performers as fuckmeat. You are not the same.
    Very good point. I also see now that this is only focused on search terms for MtF folk. I’m an equal opportunity gooner, I enjoy some fine-ass FtM peeps in porn too. I have a feeling they don’t.

    Republicans don’t believe that FtM people exist. In their minds, they’re just delusional women who wish they were men, but it makes perfect sense to them that women wish they were men. It would be weirder to them to hear that not all women wish they were men. It’s completely part of the sexism and patriarchy.

    The reason that they’re so obsessed with trans women by comparison is that it goes against their entire worldview. A man who wants to be a woman? Why would anyone ever want to be a woman?! There’s also the bigotry and everything else, of course, but the fact that it defies what they see as the natural order or hierarchy of the sexes drives them crazy.

    I mean we’ve seen Alex Jones with a “Naughty tbabe” tab open on his phone.
    Thats hilarious, so so on-brand
    the article does have this headline but doesn’t actually back it up (convincingly) at all. it seems to thinks googling ‘“shemale”, “tranny”, “femboy”, and “ladyboy”’’ counts as searching for trans porn. kelsey libert doesn’t seem to have any relevant qualifications either

    Hell ya! I was worried I was a republican their for a second, luckily those are not the terms I use to search for trans porn but like I also show trans people respect.

    Side note, I get the other terms coming from right wing ignorant assholes but feel femboy is not that bad, am I wrong on this? I have not yet read the article.

    We’ve heard lots of people referring to themselves as femboys. So probably not that bad.

    But a femboy (in the context we’re used to) isn’t a trans woman, it’s a boy with feminine qualities, I think (while still being male).

    – Frost

    Also, who uses google to search for porn? This research appears to be making a LOT of assumptions about what their data actually represents.
    I have a better argument here than they do that based on the number of comments here progressives only look for the facts they want to hear without reading the actual articles /hj

    it seems to thinks googling ‘“shemale”, “tranny”, “femboy”, and “ladyboy”’’ counts as searching for trans porn.

    What do you think they’re searching for? Scholarly dissertations? Recipes?

    **Search terms for the list ranking include only: “shemale”, “tranny”, “femboy”, and “ladyboy”

    They’re going to be missing a large chunk by excluding drawn/cartoon/anime type categories and terms like futa.

    Although, not sure how well the southern peeps are gonna know any words coming from other cultures to reference what they’re looking for.

    I think it’s interesting that the terms are predominately slur form too, which you’d expect to be more common amongst conservatives.
    Ironically, they’re treating trans women the same way they treat cis women—as sexual objects who don’t deserve bodily autonomy.
    Yay, equality?
    It’s equal opportunity alright.

    I mean, I’d say this is the opposite of ironic, it is extremely expected and logically follows from how the conservative brain/worldview works.

    Basically it just boils down to ‘being horny is a sin, sin is an evil, supernatural force or state of being, that acts with will, or comes from deliberate, intentional agency… thus anything that makes me horny, I must dominate, control, defeat, as an external enemy, and also deny that it makes me feel horny, to avoid looking like I have fallen (in) to sin.’

    When you institutionalize the idea of a fundamental, carnal, human desire as supernaturally evil, everything relating to how you interact with or experience that desire becomes a shameful perversion, and then you have to hide that perversion by one means or another, and those means are often conquest, conquest involves ‘othering’ the enemy.

    For all their talk of personal responsibility, their entire worldview is designed, with many layers of artificial constructs, to shield them from critical self-reflection, to channel them away from actually understanding themselves.

    How can you possibly be responsible for yourself, if you do not even understand yourself, why you do the things you do?

    To them, what is most important is the performance of conformity to a hierarchichal group identity role.

    That’s their ‘gender’.

    Not self-expression.

    It’s ironic because they insist that trans women aren’t women, but then they treat them like women (in this aspect, at least). That’s irony.

    Ah! Yes!

    That, that element of it, that is absolutely ironic.

    Yeah, I’ve seen this pointed out before. They say that trans women are men, but they don’t treat them like men. They treat them like women.

    This reminds me of a friend of mine whose trans daughter attending elementary school had a bully calling her a “boy” and then chasing her around and trying to kiss her. Really, kid? Do you like to kiss boys now? Obviously, sexual harassment isn’t cool at any age, and that needs to be dealt with, but it just goes to show that even at that young age deep down they know the difference.

    Everyday I find myself completely baffled by human behavior. There are days I legitimately do not think I’m the same species.

    If I hate someone, I genuinely hate 1athem. Like Gary that I worked with in 2003. 20+ years later, and I STILL think he’s one of the biggest 1assholes I ever met.

    1At NO POINT do I want Gary porn. Maybe Gary death porn, but not sexual porn. I’d like to see him walk into a walk-in closet, when a bunch of spinning blades shoot out and cut him into tiny dice sized cubes.

    But these people claim to hate trans folks, but then go home and beat their meat to them? Where’s the hate then??? If you’re going to hate someone, truely hate them because they stand for everything you dispise. Otherwise, you’re just saying your own values mean nothing to you, and you shouldn’t be taken seriously at face value.

    And in this particular case, why even bother hating trans people at all? Just accept trans people for who they are, and bust all the nuts you want without being a hypocrite.

    Aside from kids and animals, there aren’t many kinks I’d look down on people for, as long as they’re just true to themselves. I may not like the idea of licking feet, but if thats your thing, own up to it! Be yourself!

    Why the random numbers
    THE NUMBERS, MASON!
    WHAT DO THEY MEAN??
    Data Finds Republicans are Obsessed with Searching for Transgender Porn - Lemmy.World

    Lemmy

    Question:What’s up with those 1s in front of your 'a’s in paragraph 2?
    Typos. I was walking while typing this, and my finger must have touched the keyboard a few times.
    What did you do Gary?
    We don’t talk about it

    Most people are more complex than black-and-white, most of my co-workers are freenemies.

    Enemies to lovers is such a common trope too.

    This is why I hate every job I’ve ever had, most folks seem to be more than happy to fuck each other over, act like your friend to your face but would be happy to stab you in the back for a dollar. I refuse to act like that and think its morally repugnant to engage in that behavior. Its heart wrenching how common its become

    To make it worse, they actually need me, they are shooting themselves in the foot by doing that.

    I don’t mean I’m super-skilled, I mean that the turnover is so high, they are always low on manpower.

    Deviation from social expectations can be attractive as can novelty. Fetishization of a group is often associated with the group being perceived as exotic and possibly even taboo. And there are a lot of people who when they feel shame about their desires lash out against those they desire. The sort of guy who feels the need to tell everyone he’s not into fat chicks? Yeah he’s getting rejected by them in secret.

    Your example is someone you personally hate because Gary fucking sucks. But if there were a group of Garys who were just a bit different that you were always told not to interact with because they’re bad despite the fact that they all seem perfectly nice if a bit odd. Well a certain portion of your community would find themselves torn between the excitement of the exotic (hell you don’t see a Gary every day, and you usually have to go to a certain part of town to see one) and the expectations of not interacting with them, and this would lead to shame and anger, because to an unexamined and immature person these Garys are seducing them, tempting them away from what they know to be the rightful separation of good normal people and Garys. This is even worse if anyone could turn out to have always been a Gary. Maybe some of those people are afraid they might be a Gary but are afraid to even think about it enough to discount it. So they may start calling to ensure there’s no chance of them accidentally running into a Gary and making sure nobody becomes a Gary hoping that that will keep them safe and maybe even punish the Garys who did this to them.

    Goddamn, I’d really like to see this Gary fellow.
    He’s the person in your dreams that’s just out of reach.

    i was just skimming and (๑·̀ᗝ·́)૭ GARY!!!

    what is it with garys?

    (i love you grampa gary)

    I ain’t beatin’ my meat to trans porn! I swear! I’m just… I’m just researching the enemy!
    Yeah 14 hours of researchin, i really gotta know what to look out for. Yeah and those noises i was frying some chicken, nothing goes better than cock with researchin.

    On the bright side, once trans people start to disappear, they will be the first to rebell.

    Ok, maybe just hoping.

    um, if i suddenly stop posting, one of three things:

    i moved to piefed (good ending)
    i’m a refugee somewhere (maybe ending)
    they got me (bad ending)

    i’m not trans, i’m disabled. they’re 40 miles away right now. everyone in the states needs to be making all the plans.

    Nazi madness. They will pay for this!
    Oh shit… oh no… this can’t fucking be… am I conservative?
    You’ve fallen into a logical of fallacy of confirming the consequent.
    Edited it and added the /s for sarcasm there for ya buddy. 🫂
    I know. I just really wanted to flex my trans master debater knowledge.
    That’s awesome, you know I was actually on the debate team in HS and I would absolutely love to see your master debating skills 😈
    Article says there are more searches for trans-related keywords in GOP areas. However it doesn’t say anything about trans porn searches vs cis porn searches. It wouldn’t surprise me if conservative areas have more searches for porn in general, so all the numbers are higher. Anyway the article uses a lot of statistical jargon without seeming to check this basic issue. FAIL.
    Yeah, and if it did, I feel like it’s their vigilante fantasy scour. Not genuine crank material. Either way, unhealthy obsession.
    Yeah, it’s just correlation, which does not mean it’s true, the reason could be a different one
    It doesn’t say whether VPN exits are counted either.
    I swear Pornhub has released a similar report in the past that did check out the same way. And the same with gay porn.