Cassandra is only carbon now6d ago
@dangoodin @cthos I'm deeply not sure that I understand your point. By and large, though, the people who hold that information about me have fallen in to the second part of my toot: institutions that have much, *much* bigger problems like "collaborating with fascists" and "adopting AI" that affect my security more than their choice to use PQC or not.
Show threadDan Goodin6d ago

@xgranade @cthos

Fair. Personally, I think China or Russia getting access to US national secrets will affect me personally, but this is more about geopolitics than cryptography.

Show threadCassandra is only carbon now

@dangoodin @cthos Apologies, I missed the notification on this one. But anyway, yeah, perhaps. Regardless, though, that's not part of my own personal infosec posture, which was the post you initially responded.

I also doubt the White House cares much for my professional opionins, given they appear to want me dead. Even under the Biden admin and even when they directly asked me, none of my opinions on quantum education meant much.

Mar 25 at 11:47pmWeb
Show threadCassandra is only carbon now6d ago

@dangoodin @cthos I'll also add that Trump has been found guilty of giving away classified Intel to nation-state adversaries, so as long as he's commander-in-chief, the US will have bigger infosec problems than Chinese or Russian quantum cryptanalysis.

That doesn't mean the US shouldn't adopt PQC, but it does change how I read the news about PQC deployment.