90% of Claude-linked output going to GitHub repos w <2 stars

https://www.claudescode.dev/?window=since_launch

Claude's Code

Global dashboard tracking the coding activity of Anthropic's Claude Code agent.

Perfect example of a base rate fallacy - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_rate_fallacy

What percentage of GitHub activity goes to GitHub repos with less than 2 stars? I would guess it's close to the same number.

Base rate fallacy - Wikipedia

Yeah. Most of my public repos have 0 stars. Most of what I write sucks.

Yeah, but knowing something sucks means you are probably reasonably competent at coding. =3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

Dunning–Kruger effect - Wikipedia

+1 star for ttul