Just got this from Microslop GitHub:

> We're updating how GitHub uses data to improve AI-powered coding tools. From April 24 onward, your interactions with GitHub Copilot—including inputs, outputs, code snippets, and associated context—may be used to train and enhance AI models unless you opt out.

I barely ever use GitHub. When I do, it's when I am forced to because some project I rely on only uses GitHub.

If your project is only using GitHub, please consider migrating.

#GitHub #Slop #AI

@rysiek What alternative do you suggest to GitHub Copilot users concerned about processing their chatbot history?

@mkljczk not to use Microsoft GitHub Copilot, nor Microsoft GitHub for that matter.

There is a lot of reporting on how using genAI in coding is actually detrimental to productivity and quality of work, and how it leads to de-skilling.

Here's a great long read that doesn't mention Copilot, but rather looks at the effects of using these tools from a more long-term perspective:
https://freakonometrics.hypotheses.org/89367

If No One Pays for Proof, Everyone Will Pay for the Loss

This post was initially written in French, Si personne ne paie pour la preuve, tout le monde paiera pour le sinistre Let’s start with a truism. In ordinary life, just as in economic life, we have to make decisions without ever knowing everything. Every decision involves some uncertainty, and therefore some risk. Some risks are … Continue reading If No One Pays for Proof, Everyone Will Pay for the Loss →

Freakonometrics
@rysiek What does all of this (which I agree with) have to do with a github policy change affecting copilot users?
@mkljczk it's just another example of how abusive Microsoft GitHub is. Maybe for somebody this will become the last straw.
@mkljczk @rysiek Codeberg, and learning to write their own code.