Why is #Netanyahu not in The Hague already for war crimes?

Why do so called ‘military lawyers’ consider white phosphorus fine when used to hide their own side’s troop movements - surely exposing them to toxic fumes and risk of chemical burns? But it’s illegal when used on opponent’s built up civilian areas?

Why is the enforced movement of civilians from opponent’s homelands considered a safe and responsible thing to do? Creating a ‘buffer zone’ is in what way legal?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/25/israel-white-phosphorus-south-lebanon-researchers

Israel used white phosphorus to scorch earth in south Lebanon, researcher says

Human Rights Watch and others say they have documented use of weapon in civilian areas during war on Gaza

The Guardian
@JugglingWithEggs he would be if he had shifted his alliance from USA/west to say China, like Philippines ex leader found out the hard way. Even if you're only just a best buddy of the west, that is all needed to benefit from all the perks including not getting hold up to the laws, rules, regulations, norms whatnot west always hold so dear...