As for oil, #PaulKrugman points out there's no way to significantly reduce oil usage in the short term, other than by reducing personal use of petrol-powered cars.
https://paulkrugman.substack.com/p/how-to-burn-less-oil

Doing it on the supply side is prohibitive (you'd need fuel prices to increase by, say, 100-200 % in the USA; or, even less likely, ration fuel). On the demand side I guess you can pay people to commute by bike or public transport. Both options are probably cheaper than the usual #FossilSubsidies.

@nemobis
I can't see beyond the paywall so I can't see the arguments.
However I am a little sceptical that personal transport makes up most of the use of oil, and while reducing the use of cars is laudable, if not essential, I'm doubtful it would achieve the stated desires.
I'd like to see a breakdown in oil use which encompasses air travel (broken down into personal business travel/ private jets, leisure travel and freight), shipping ( broken down into freight, cruise lines and other), military use, as well as personal vehicles, heating oil.

I'm no apologist for motorists but I wonder if they are seen as a soft target when the Pareto Principle might yield more reduction in oil use.