Paddy Duke3h ago
Adrian Roselli, pH0

Remember anything at Forbes•com/sites is paid content, not journalism. These articles are often wrong (as first quote shows) and have an agenda (as in second quote).

“Google Just Patented The End Of Your Website”
https://www.forbes.com/sites/joetoscano1/2026/03/06/google-just-patented-the-end-of-your-website/

Google is still terrible tho.

1:21pmWeb
Show threadAntiComposite3h ago
@aardrian This isn't strictly true anymore, you have to check the byline. "Forbes Contributor", "Senior Contributor", etc. are all outside authors without significant editorial review. "Forbes Staff" are professional journalists with editorial review. Both end up on /sites pages now.
Show threadAdrian Roselli, pH03h ago

@anticomposite Are you saying things under /sites written by “Forbes Staff” is possible journalism?

Or are you saying that _in addition_ to what I said, Forbes articles *not* under /sites may also be questionable based on the byline?

Show threadAntiComposite3h ago
@aardrian It used to be that all "Contributors" were under /sites/ and staff weren't. This is no longer the case, staff articles are now also published under /sites/.
Show threadAdrian Roselli, pH03h ago

@anticomposite Ah. Good to know.

Which, IMO, suggests staff articles should be treated with the same wariness.