Are LLMs useful or problematic for the standards process? We gave it some thought and listed benefits, risks, and best practices in a position paper that we published today: https://www.w3.org/TR/llms-standards/
Use of Large Language Models in Standards Work

As Large Language Models (LLMs) become increasingly synonymous with “AI”, and are used by people within our community, we want to highlight considerations around different ways in which LLMs can be useful or problematic when it comes to leveraging them in standards work at W3C.

This is the first time we published a position in this way, and we welcome your thoughts! We plan to publish more positions in the future, as well as possible updates to this one.
@ab an interesting document :) i am having a hard time imagining when I would want to see work that is “primarily the output of an LLM”, that section might be more understandable with an example.