A brief experiment comparing graphics on native qemu-kvm vs libvirt. I tried to make them as close to similar in operation as possible. Here's the relevant flags:
* qemu-kvm -device virtio-gpu -vga none -display "sdl,gl=on"
* virt-install --graphics spice,gl.enable=yes,listen=none
Result:
- qemu's sdl display is pretty fast, supports resizing/scaling in a way that the guest vm will detect.
- libvirt and virt-install's method requires a separate viewer tool, virt-viewer, which is ... *extremely* laggy and much lower-than-acceptable framerate, even local-only enabled by 'listen=none'
I dunno. I don't enjoy qemu's endless number of flags, but I'm not enjoying libvirt either as it doesn't seem to simplify anything and makes performance worse.
(If you know a better graphics configuration for libvirt/virt-install, please let me know)
