RE: https://kolektiva.social/@Hex/116272428351854596

Somehow I had more thoughts on this subject...

I've linked corporations, religion, government, and the Fermi paradox, which, I think, is something difficult to do without ADHD.

This is actually not too far off from a pamphlet I wrote at my community college as an experiment in "turning assignments into creative writing." I was taking a religion class, so I decided to create one. I was working in a group and by the end we had developed 3 sects of the religion and we each talked about our sect and how it related and differed from the original text.

I also handed out pamphlets at a mall, half as part of a psychology class (because why not find a way to reuse my material) and part as an experiment to see how long it would take to get kicked out of said mall. (The answer was bout 15 minutes, if I remember correctly.)

Somewhere between there and here, the books "The Evolution of God" and "Non-Zero" came out (written, interestingly but probably unrelated, by someone who lived in the town with that mall where I handed out those flyers). These books both have heavily overlapping ideas with the original pamphlet (lost, which may not be the worst thing since it was full of spelling and grammar errors).

But both of those books had a decidedly theistic flavor, though, I think, they were more generally liberal. The whole #CultPunk thing feels like a missing piece to something that's been bouncing around in my head for... uh... some years. But not so much at the front of my mind.

It was actually in the hospital, on pain killers and ketamine, that this all came rushing back. Perhaps that's the right state of mind for such things.

This is actually not too far off from a pamphlet I wrote at my community college as an experiment in "turning assignments into creative writing." I was taking a religion class, so I decided to create one. I was working in a group and by the end we had developed 3 sects of the religion and we each talked about our sect and how it related and differed from the original text.

I also handed out pamphlets at a mall, half as part of a psychology class (because why not find a way to reuse my material) and part as an experiment to see how long it would take to get kicked out of said mall. (The answer was bout 15 minutes, if I remember correctly.)

Somewhere between there and here, the books "The Evolution of God" and "Non-Zero" came out (written, interestingly but probably unrelated, by someone who lived in the town with that mall where I handed out those flyers). These books both have heavily overlapping ideas with the original pamphlet (lost, which may not be the worst thing since it was full of spelling and grammar errors).

But both of those books had a decidedly theistic flavor, though, I think, they were more generally liberal. The whole #CultPunk thing feels like a missing piece to something that's been bouncing around in my head for... uh... some years. But not so much at the front of my mind.

It was actually in the hospital, on pain killers and ketamine, that this all came rushing back. Perhaps that's the right state of mind for such things.

@Hex haven't read it yet, but I assume you're talking about how our self destructive organizations are what creates the Great Filter?
@ArcMother yes, but it's kind of condensed to a little bit at the end.

@Hex finally got around to reading this :)

the point you make feels very similar to the idea of the Big Other, in psychoanalysis. there, this Big Other is something we can inherit (and we can have more than one), but we can also recognize it doesn't exist as such and express our own will by choosing one (or more) for ourselves

the essence, as i understand it, is that we always have a Big Other, even when we think ourselves free of it. we have a "gaze" under which we perform (1/4)

@Hex about the aesthetic of your writing, it seems to me like it would benefit from two things:

1. following a structure that allows readers to ultimately follow you from hypothesis to conclusion. doesn't mean this has to sound like a maths proof. i really like the taste of chaos in your writing. however, it's very difficult, right now, to distinguish which things are "your hypothesis" and where the conclusion starts / ends

2. a stronger, more clearly worded conclusion. (2/4)

@Hex right now, it feels like the conclusion is a re-stating of the opening paragraph ("you give thought-time to an external entity, a god, and you are free to fashion your god. when you chose your god you prefigurate what the god wants. when you act in line with the desire of your god, you enact a religion")

there are some rhetorical questions added at the end that seem to branch out from this, but it's not clear where they want to go ("what if our god was ego dissolution?") (3/4)

@Hex i wonder if you want to further refine this or if it was pushed out as a way to get the connections onto paper and out of your head

i can see this as a little zine

but i would also love this to be a little bolder ;) (4/4)