ig the idea is that California has 40m people, but none of them are both 18 and women? Idk why violet’s demographic is relevant at all, let alone important enough to think she’s lying about 😂

It’s because of the fact that violet makes all of violet’s posts about violet. Naturally people are going to want to know more about violet, but then violet responds that anyone who wants to know about violet is deranged.

They represent themselves as basically a typical woman as written by a male sci-fi author, and then they aggressive towards anyone who questions it.

Look at me, I am woman, I have BOOBS, I like big sex and getting pounded, I am woman, I am an OBJECT. Not all women have personality. I am real woman with woman private parts. This is my entire persona. You don’t beleive me? You are fuuuuucked up.

violet makes all of violet’s posts about violet.

No… she doesn’t…?

Looking at her posts on the new account, she’s clearly playing as a young and hot woman who is “based” and uses raunchy humor to appeal to the crowds here. All 3 of the posts have this same perspective so far.

Granted I didn’t catch a lot of her original account’s postings, just saw it here and there, but she is clearly posting her points of view.

Everyone posts from their point of view. I’m doing it right now.

Ehh yes and no. A lot of users here are posting like news articles, comic strips, and the like that usually center around the news topic or political topic.

Violet posts (so far) are strictly from the perspective of funny hot girl making commentary on the internet.

This isn’t a critique, just an observation.

Posting a news article is foundationally tied to which articles you’ve seen and which you find interesting.

It’s really besides the point, though. Violet being horny is no more notable than me being very loudly anti AI.

I don’t care that she’s horny - as I said, I wasn’t critiquing her. Her posts have a very particular flavor, so to speak, and it does revolve around her personality first and foremost. You immediately know what type of person that user is trying to portray when you look at the user history.

You immediately know what type of person that user is trying to portray

What kind of person would that be?

I’m not asking as a personal attack, by the way; I am aware you don’t care that she’s horny.

Lol the exact type of person I keep describing to you over and over again - A young, hot American woman who is “based” and uses her sexuality and raunchy humor to get her points of view noticed by the type of users that Lemmy attracts.

Whether that person is the actual person behind the screen or a character they made up, who knows? But the character outline is very clear from her posts.

Okay, what you’re describing is identical to everyone’s proverbial grandpa claiming that the gay man in front of him is dressed flamboyantly “just for attention.” I don’t believe that being a young, hot, American woman who is ‘based’ is worthy of pointing out. As far as I’m concerned, it’s immaterial.

…what?

Hey man, sorry if you got real wrapped up in your crush on Violet or whatever and this is just too real for you hahaha

Sigh, I knew you didn’t actually care.

Look, I love insulting people, but in not going to sit here and do this nuh-uh, yuh-uh, nuh-uh thing that you seem to want to.

I thought we were having a casual conversation about this character of a user that has popped up on Lemmy again today and what it means to build a very personality-forward post history. I didn’t know we were doing a nuh-uh, yuh-uh thing.

But ok.

Not buying it

Buying what?

You, your act, your argument, any of it

What argument am I making?

Playing dumb? Or actually just dumb? Embarassing either way