Vlastimil Babka 🇨🇿🇪🇺🇺🇦Mar 23
mm patches be like
Show threadFernando F. ManceraMar 23
@vbabka What were you saying yesterday about requiring the sender to refute the LLM?
Show threadVlastimil Babka 🇨🇿🇪🇺🇺🇦Mar 23
@ffmancera yep, it's spreading :(
I don't deny it can be useful and point out bugs, but not like this...
Show threadFernando F. ManceraMar 23
@vbabka FWIW, in netdev it is not required to refute sashiko, although there is a Netdev LLM CI which is reviewed by a maintainer and if they consider the output is useful then you must refute it (if it is wrong).
Show threadFernando F. ManceraMar 23
@vbabka Btw, this netdev LLM is much better than sashiko tbh
Show threadVlastimil Babka 🇨🇿🇪🇺🇺🇦
@ffmancera yeah I heard sashiko points out much more wrong stuff. Could be it's newer and needs more work, or the underlying LLM is worse.
Mar 23 at 11:15pmWeb