Is no one held accountable if a driverless EV ran over a pedestrian?

Legal chalenges are this: the driverless EV ran over someone but what happens is that corporations (often) bribe the judicial parties not charging …

Why does it matter if it’s an EV?
Mainly because EVs are the vehicle type trying out driverless technology.
Okay, but a quote like: “Usually, when it’s a EV (with no human driver behind the wheel)” makes it seem like the poster thinks that being an electric vehicle is a prerequisite to being driverless. Also, it seems like the poster thinks that “EV” almost implies “driverless”.
Acronyms, at some point someone doesn’t care what each letter stands for and makes an assumption, then other people use them that way.