Interestingly, the Westbahn is not much slower than the RJX between Graz and Vienna, despite having more stops.

This may be related to the slightly higher top-speed

@navi but what about the reliability, ill take a 30 minute slower ride if it means i can make my connections reliably
@desea it seems reliable to me as well
@desea both of them, actually
@desea which makes sense given they use the same railroad
@navi i am specifically referencing the concept of running train lines below the actual max speed they could achieve so you have some buffer to catch up in case there is delay

@desea ah, this.

yeah but it's also nice to have a fast connection. if you add buffer it gets less fast.

@navi even a 10 minute slower route can mean the difference between making or missing a connection, i really don't think marginal add to top speed is worth the drop in reliability unless all you do is single trips with no umsteigen
@desea idk. between graz and vienna it is one train
@navi so it goes the full 250?
@deneb apparently so
Kiara :neocat_boop_cute: (@[email protected])

@navi no, the higher top speed is only relevant between Graz and Klagenfurt, everything up to Vienna is currently 160 max

CatCatNya~
@navi want to look at the tables at some point. The SBB trains in Germany have so so small tables. Not of use at all
@kloenk the tables here are useful; when present.
@kloenk @navi i doubt they will be any different given it's the same batch
@navi it might also in part be due to the typical Westbahn strategy of „depart as soon as possible after arrival“ (while ÖBB loves to wait for who-knows-what)
@follpvosten oh yeah. i love that WB does this. ÖBB should also do this more
@navi no, the higher top speed is only relevant between Graz and Klagenfurt, everything up to Vienna is currently 160 max
@itsKiara ah. well then how the fuck do they compete with the RJX' time
@navi it's only 2 more stops, which is 8 mins max, but they always plan less loading times and they have a bit faster accelleration