I teach both middle school "technology" (think shop class mixed with Computer Science) and I later teach the same students in geometry and calculus in high school. This means when I first work with students there are no grades, just an opportunity to be creative and learn how to use tools and programming to make things.

This creates an amazing foundation for our work in academics later.

I wonder if it could be a model for improving math education we could expand?

When I only work with students in a context where I'm giving a grade, and that grade is "high stakes" because colleges care about math grades the students are less likely to bring their full creative potential to the subject of math. Grade grubbing happens.

But when they know me from working on a project first, where the feedback is narrative, where they help set the goals they are just more open to really learning the material, not just "getting through it"

Also when schools gut their arts programs, when they get rid of things like shop class and PE it's really harmful. It's harmful even if all you care about is students learning "the basics" eg. how to read and write, how to understand numbers and a smattering of history. Young people can't understand those things as well when they simply have less experience in everything.

@futurebird

This is so well said. I work in a school with a middle school that most definitely covers the basics, but the emphasis is on experiential learning. There are no grades, all feedback is narrative. Classes are mixed ages, 6th-8th grade. Lots of work is project-based and thus hands-on. Math, science, humanities, art -- they're all integrated with each other. Students set goals for themselves, dive into personal interests under an umbrella topic, understand the inter-relatedness of various fields of study.

These students go on to flourish in high school.

But every year, *every* *single* *year*, we have at least one family that takes their kid out of the program, because the adults in the family don't think our academics are "rigorous" enough. Because what we do doesn't look like the rote learning they themselves endured.

It is heartbreaking, and no matter how well we communicate what we are doing and *why* -- it still happens. I wish I could just whip out your quote for these folks to read, every time they start getting nervous. But it probably wouldn't matter. We say all the things you say, in our own way, and it so often falls on deaf ears.

@anne @futurebird that 'rigor' nonsense is toxic. We have to totally remove it from education. This school sounds awesome, I gotta know more

@fluffykittycat

What would you like to know? 🙂