Sure. But one seat off 20% of first preferences statewide still means you're irrelevant. The problem here is with conservatism. It is not fit for purpose.

#sapol

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-22/one-nation-projected-to-win-lower-house-seat-abc-projects/106483382

Breaking: One Nation wins first seat in SA parliament's lower house, ABC projects

One Nation is projected to win its first seat in South Australia's lower house, the first time the party has done so outside of Queensland. 

@trib As someone who's always tried to argue the Greens are relevant at 12% of the vote...

I can't deny that One Nation are relevant at 20%.

I'm not sure how the SA parliament works, but federally 20% gets a lot of senate seats, and will be influential.

@tomroberts I think they're talking about 1-2 more Upper House seats in SA. So still just noise.

It's the same problem the Greens have: plenty of voters, but thinly spread.

@trib @tomroberts

Potentially 3 upper house seats and maybe 3 or 4 in the lower house. Not huge numbers but the result confirmed the polling was accurate

#SAPol #SAVotes

@HardBeingGreen @tomroberts also confirming the ongoing decay of moderate conservatism into a meaningless rump and that conservative voters will choose racism and grievance every time.

Conservatism is a disease. Centrism is equally thus. Notionally progressive parties need to take note and act of reasonable and progressive policy platforms that better their communities. Unfortunately, I do not hold out hope.