Miek GiebenOmg... Freebsd is still using shell scripts for startup and shutdown...
James Just James@miekg Also nobody is still using BSD. Well very few anyways.
Safigo
curtosis@safigo @purpleidea @miekg Still very much the case.
OPNsense is FreeBSD-based. So is Juniper’s JunOS.
AIUI there are some exceptions for unusual/proprietary network silicon, but the BSD network stack is still where you go for high performance and stability.
@purpleidea @safigo @miekg That’s one benefit for proprietary systems vendors, but that doesn’t mean it’s not *also* more performant.
@curtosis @safigo @miekg The performance comes from the ASIC. We'd have better networking in those respects if Broadcom would release docs and let people program chips like the Tridents... Linux is making headway anyways with switchdev. Check it out. Society could be solving more interesting problems than secret silicon hiding.
Wouter Verhelst
Tom@purpleidea
They've given talks on how using FreeBSD gives them technological advantages over and above what Linux could give them.
Could the license be considered an advantage by their business people? Maybe. But I don't believe it's their only reason, or even their main reason.
@safigo @miekg
They've given talks on how using FreeBSD gives them technological advantages over and above what Linux could give them.
Could the license be considered an advantage by their business people? Maybe. But I don't believe it's their only reason, or even their main reason.
@safigo @miekg
@wouter @safigo @purpleidea are those talks available somewhere?
I don't see freebsd could be any better than linux or vice versa.
When I used it in the early 2000s I didn't like it too much, spoiler by the gnu userspace if you can believe that.
Is debian still doing a distro with the freebsd kernel?
@miekg
Don't think they're available, no.
The best I know of is https://freebsdfoundation.org/end-user-stories/netflix-case-study/
No, Debian's kFreeBSD port is dead dead dead.
@safigo @purpleidea
Don't think they're available, no.
The best I know of is https://freebsdfoundation.org/end-user-stories/netflix-case-study/
No, Debian's kFreeBSD port is dead dead dead.
@safigo @purpleidea
Maintaining the World’s Fastest Content Delivery Network at Netflix on FreeBSD | FreeBSD Foundation
Netflix needed a high-performance, low-maintenance, and reliable operating system to stream content to their 260+ million subscribers efficiently.
@miekg
In fact, that article states that 'contributing upstream' is part of what Netflix considers core to its success in using FreeBSD, which basically negates any so called benefit you might have in not being bound by the GPL...
@purpleidea @safigo
In fact, that article states that 'contributing upstream' is part of what Netflix considers core to its success in using FreeBSD, which basically negates any so called benefit you might have in not being bound by the GPL...
@purpleidea @safigo
@wouter @safigo @purpleidea https://papers.freebsd.org/2019/FOSDEM/looney-Netflix_and_FreeBSD.files/FOSDEM_2019_Netflix_and_FreeBSD.pdf
s/freebsd/linux and the info stays the same
@miekg
FreeBSD still outperforms anything Linux can throw at it at the high end though.
And https://people.freebsd.org/~gallatin/talks/OpenFest2023.pdf talks about 800Gb/s servers, where performance matters.
@safigo @purpleidea
FreeBSD still outperforms anything Linux can throw at it at the high end though.
And https://people.freebsd.org/~gallatin/talks/OpenFest2023.pdf talks about 800Gb/s servers, where performance matters.
@safigo @purpleidea
@miekg
There are benchmarks, e.g., https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2406146-NE-2406131NE13&hni=1&sgm=1&sor#r-542e6001bf05f1eaa298d6ffc8001da894c3a653, in 'geometric mean of all benchmarks' at the bottom shows FreeBSD on top. The difference is small enough to not matter to most people, but large enough that if you run gazillions of machines it might matter.
@safigo @purpleidea
There are benchmarks, e.g., https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2406146-NE-2406131NE13&hni=1&sgm=1&sor#r-542e6001bf05f1eaa298d6ffc8001da894c3a653, in 'geometric mean of all benchmarks' at the bottom shows FreeBSD on top. The difference is small enough to not matter to most people, but large enough that if you run gazillions of machines it might matter.
@safigo @purpleidea
@miekg
One advantage which FreeBSD has over Linux is that due to its smaller community, they can focus more on certain things. Linux has people pulling it in all kinds of, sometimes conflicting, ways. This is not as much of a problem for FreeBSD.
@safigo @purpleidea
One advantage which FreeBSD has over Linux is that due to its smaller community, they can focus more on certain things. Linux has people pulling it in all kinds of, sometimes conflicting, ways. This is not as much of a problem for FreeBSD.
@safigo @purpleidea
boomerOpenBSD is great if you want a simple, coherent system with "batteries included" and said batteries being provided by the same project.
E.g. OpenBSD comes with a web server (httpd), firewall (pf), mail server (openSMTPD), etc. etc.
It's also slower moving, which can be preferable. Stuff you learned years ago still applies. There's not a new fancy way to to stuff every 2-3 years.
It works really well on laptops/desktops as well, unless you have an NVIDIA gpu or need bluetooth.