Nietifa Van SuikerWhy does the EAW address how the project will respond to changing climatic conditions (increased rains, more freeze / thaw, higher temperatures) but not also address how the project will continue to contribute to those very conditions?
1/
Why does the EAW mention geographically related, potential projects (Rondo Landbridge) but not others (the Boulevard alternative)?
2/
Section 10b - how can there be "no anticipated incompatibilities ... with adjacent land uses" when by its very nature, the existing (and proposed replacement) highway so significantly and adversely impacts adjacent land uses?
3/
Noise, particulates (including toxic materials and microplastics), and emissions ALL have a well-documented, but seemingly in this report, ignored, impact on people in residences, places of work, education, business, worship, everything(!), not to mention the soil, water, and air in this area.
4/