@RobotDiver @hauchvonstaub I am sad about it as well.
I've said it before, we have forgotten how hard it was to build a society that wasn't "nasty, brutish and short" for a noticeable fraction of the population. For me it stems from anti-intellectualism and the destruction of a belief that things are discoverable and knowable. Largely from a death spiral feedback loop in the education system. But it could just be that technology induced change is moving too fast for people and society in general to keep up.
I think there is a natural rate of assimilable change connected to the rough generations of 20 or so years.
I've heard it said that anything invented before the age of 12 is normal and the way it's always been. Anything invented between 12-35 is the cool new thing that everyone should be using. And anything invented after the age of 35 is the spawn of the devil and will lead to the downfall of society.
I wonder if the recent rate of change has exceeded that natural adoption rate, if the normal vs cool things change several times in that 12-35 age then you lose you footing and sense of which way is up?
Hmm... calling history buff's/majors, is there a paper with a regression analysis of historical upheavals vs tech rate of change? But it's probably like global warming, everything before 1900 is flat, and everything after is a vertical line.