@mjg59 but anyway, high disagree that there should be a singular "the core infrastructure" to begin with
variety and diversity is one of the things that make Linux appealing and broadly useable, harmonizing towards a monoculture ain't it imo
@shiz @mjg59 excessive variety and its fanatical zealots were what was holding linux/freedesktop back by decades.
having 300 ways to manage windows, 200 ways to configure system startup and 100 ways to configure the network is nerd masturbation. it does not a competitive real-world-able platform make
@valpackett Linux systems in all kinds of shapes and forms have been "competitive" in the real world since way before systemd came along, even if that were the only metric to care about
regardless, you'll understand I'm not very interested in further engaging in a discussion when the first reply is full of dramatical hyperbole and dismissal
@alwayscurious @valpackett @shiz @mjg59 This is false. While monogameous project grow fast in the longer run they are very toxic for the whole environment.
Like with browsers, when one engine dominates the web developers stop keeping to the W3C standards and just make it work with IE/Chrome. It's pathological.
We also need alternatives in case The Big Project goes bad (like Systemd right now accepting AI pull requests or adopting dangerous California law)
This is why we need competing standards for a healthy platform.
It's slower, but it's good (unless you want to move fast and break things like certain wealthy ketamine lover)