Sorry this is behind a paywall (I think) but I felt compelled to share it anyway.
https://www.ft.com/content/c0e0bcd2-f8c9-4d45-ae2b-73a31195f74c?shareType=nongift
> If the code contains hidden security vulnerabilities, the prose is packed with fabricated facts or plagiarised phrases, or the structural engineering calculations seem fine but the building will collapse in the first storm, that is a problem. It is still a problem even if the mistakes are rare and the average quality excellent.

