Kos here attempting to make sense of Melbourne. I think it’s just that people get tired of looking at the same political faces, so they dump them. https://open.substack.com/pub/redbridgeintel/p/victorias-unprocessed-trauma-is-now?r=2wzki&utm_medium=ios #auspol #victoria
Victoria’s Unprocessed Trauma Is Now Political

Melbourne’s pandemic trauma was never processed. Now it’s showing up in the polling. It took a while, but the science explains why.

RedBridge’s latest Insights & Intel

@andyjennings I can't help the feeling that this article focuses on the side-effects of managing a pandemic and not acknowledging the pandemic (the disease) itself. It's a bit like a cancer patient blaming the oncologist for the chemo side effects without acknowledging the cure. Several of my family members have long Covid to the point where they are invalids and can't work. That is how bad the disease can be.

The government's strategy of silence, a pretence to try and return back to a pre 2020 "normal" has brought on what the article has described. Yet I don't see this denial of the physical damage from the actual disease acknowledged in the article. It's blaming the oncologist for the chemo and denying, or not understanding the underlying disease.

@georgegalanis yes, I agree. Consider the trauma and impact from the large number of people who would have died without the measures. To me he is projecting assumptions onto the data rather than actually trying to understand what is going on.
@andyjennings
Thanks for your reply.
Projecting assumptions, as you call it, seems to be a problem in sociology. I wonder how big the "error bars" are in their stats?