I'm really struggling with the idea that the responsibility to correct for corporate evil resides with individuals, and that failing to do so constitutes some form of evil itself.
It would seem tantamount to castigating individuals for not recycling "enough" when the true cause of pollution lies with industry.
It would seem a way for capital to coerce the pro-human and anti-capital to tear each other apart, causing nothing but self-inflicted wounds.
Then again, blithe oblivion to whence one's resources come also seems irresponsible.
But like, I have work to do that is more important than choosing the least impure tool every goddamn day.
@mttaggart You've probably already heard, but BP invented the concept of an individual "carbon footprint" https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/aug/23/big-oil-coined-carbon-footprints-to-blame-us-for-their-greed-keep-them-on-the-hook
But I've been feeling this way about the political system too. Its very popular to blame voters for choosing wrong or not bothering to vote, rather than looking at the dynamics of why that happens. We are only allowed dog shit options, then a ton of people point fingers at each other no matter how it shakes out.
@theorangetheme @mttaggart I just don't think its useful to complain about people who don't vote, and yelling at them to vote won't work, they've heard it all before.
Instead, the way to actually change this is to force politicians to get a little better, so they can build support, so that support can push them to be better... I think a lot of this is based on the defeatist idea that politicians can't influence public opinion or don't need to try.
I think a lot of people are just discouraged and don't think the system can ever improve or help them, and desperately want change.
Some of that sentiment got idiots to support Trump, just because he seemed different and said he would shake things up.
That sentiment was also why Sanders got so much support from slightly more informed people, including "not likely voters."
I think Dems are doomed if they don't even claim to have a vision about changing things.
@theorangetheme @mttaggart Gavin Fucking Newsom would get some PR consultants and put together a focus group to determine if closing the camps is a winning political move, and at least meet with lobbyists representing whoever is making money on it.
You know, all the "stake holders"
@theorangetheme @mttaggart Hottest take I agree with is that "Liberals see their role as mediating between the oppressors and the oppressed"
You know, not leaders, middle managers.