@Lana Oh, on the Ford too? At this point, the Navy will be damn lucky if Captain David Skarosi doesn't go full-on Red October with that ship. She's not architected for a deployment this long without taking some downtime in port, she's being run on string and chewing-gum for core livelihood features like working shitters, the crew expected shore leave about a couple months ago, and she was diverted into the path of an armed conflict that sprung up overnight and is not a war.
If it's not a war, it doesn't need commitment of a crew that's almost been at sea for a year now and there should be enough time to sail her home and unclog the damn toilets.
(... and no, I don't think for an instant that the sailors set fire to their own home. I think that when you run a crew ragged and a floating city past its standard operational cycle without taking the time and resources to do the needful, the odds of small problems becoming "an hours long fire" approach 1, and a smart chain of command knows that. And a smart President listens to that chain of command because he might know foreign policy (debatable) but they know boats.)
@mark @Lana that makes sense to me - this investigation says more to me about Pete Hegseth being paranoid because he is in way over his head, than about any real likelihood of sabotage.
I have no doubt there's been plenty of cases of small scale sabotage - "oh no, I won't be able to go march 20 miles in the rain this afternoon, the dishwasher broke so we'll just have to stay on base and hand wash everything." But not setting on fire the ship that's keeping everyone alive.