Former Uber self-driving chief crashes his Tesla on FSD, exposes supervision problem
https://electrek.co/2026/03/17/former-uber-self-driving-chief-tesla-fsd-crash-supervision-problem/
Former Uber self-driving chief crashes his Tesla on FSD, exposes supervision problem
https://electrek.co/2026/03/17/former-uber-self-driving-chief-tesla-fsd-crash-supervision-problem/
"...What makes this account particularly striking is Krikorian’s background. At Uber’s Advanced Technologies Center, he ran the team building autonomous vehicles and trained human safety drivers on exactly when and how to intervene when a self-driving system fails...."
🤔
LOL this is the problem with relying on AI tools, as well...
"...His core argument: Tesla is asking humans to supervise a system that is specifically designed to make supervision feel pointless. As he puts it, an unreliable machine keeps you alert, and a perfect machine needs no oversight, but one that works almost perfectly creates a trap where drivers trust it just enough to stop paying attention.
The research backs this up. Psychologists call it the “vigilance decrement”, monitoring a nearly perfect system is boring, boredom leads to mind-wandering, and drivers need 5 to 8 seconds to mentally reengage after an automated system hands control back. But emergencies unfold faster than that...."
@ai6yr every time
This publication comes to mind:
https://how.complexsystems.fail
As does a Human Factors lecture I attended last century (ugh) on the amount of money spent on psychological research to make fighter plane cockpits human-goof-proof, ON TOP of the extended, intense, and repeated training pilots go through.
One of the points in the early 90's was cars were becoming too complex for mere untrained humans to cope with, with next to no thought about the human-tech interface required.
@johannab @ai6yr it’s also where standards help and “innovation” breaks muscle memory and consistency. Cars have always had quirks and differences but increasingly their user interfaces are becoming so different between makes sometimes in small until it causes a crash ways
- I have two cars (a Volvo and a Kia) their interfaces do some things exactly opposite of each other (one you push up to control the windshields the other you push down) that’s minor
More major - their safety systems differ
A related problem in this "paradox of automation" discussion is that a lot of these techbros got in their imaginations that they should completely redesign the entire cockpit. They think they can "optimize" and "be more efficient" by moving or removing manual controls, since "self driving" means they're not needed.
IIRC, there has been more than one forensic investigation where people died in Teslas not in the crash, but because they couldn't get out of the fire.
I think any innovative genius who thinks they can completely redesign an entire human-tech interface like a car cockpit should first have to prove themselves by getting the entire world to adopt a new non-qwerty keyboard within two fiscal years and demonstrate through replicable peer-reviewed research that typographical errors no longer happen so they can safely remove the backspacer.
Then I'll listen to their ideas about door handles or signal levers or brake pedals.
@johannab @ai6yr @kajord @Rycaut I just do not understand the need to remove all manual controls. HUGE aircraft, such as the Boeing 777 and the Airbus 340 and many others, are programmed to fly from runway to runway, including takeoff and landing. The hard- and soft-ware must pass extreme testing before being used in live situations. Yet, the cockpit designers didn't remove all the manual controls. They understand that not every flight goes smoothly. While landing these behemoths manually is difficult, the pilot and co-pilot are highly trained to do exactly that.
The hubris of these techbros thinking their "AI", that has repeatedly FAILED simple testing, let alone any rigorous testing, is up to self-driving at all is incredible. And taking away the controls for manual driving is the epitome of stupidity.... and these guys are designing cars?
@silver_buttercat @johannab @ai6yr @kajord they really are stupid - and unaware of how real people live and need their vehicles.
I argue with a friend who is a huge proponent of self-driving cars/taxis (he seriously argues that no one will drive themselves in the future) - he doesn't seem to at all understand how parents use cars - or even simple stuff like the fact that I almost NEVER leave the house for a single destination - that as a working parent I'm almost always making multiple stops
@silver_buttercat @johannab @ai6yr @kajord and my son may have been atypical but at times it would take 45 minutes or longer to get him to get in (or out) of the car when he was being a stubborn toddler and didn't want to go home from preschool.
Or when he was a baby or toddler he would fall asleep in the car and we would either keep driving or pull over and let him sleep - in either case not something we would have done in a driverless vehicle (imagine one driving off with a sleeping baby)
@Rycaut @silver_buttercat @ai6yr @kajord
oof, thanks for that nightmare fuel. I went through a severe bout of postpartum anxiety where night terrors and intrusive thoughts mostly fixated on something happening to my daughter because she was stuck in her carseat. 😬
pls don't worry about triggering that, it's a decade past resolved, but I mean YES I GET THAT WORRY AND HOW DO PEOPLE THINK IT OK TO LET THESE THINGS LOOSE IN THE WORLD.
@silver_buttercat @johannab @ai6yr @kajord @Rycaut
The car certification people are also guilty.