Riley S. FaelanAt which point of the scale of republicans wanting to give their president absolute power start they count as monarchists? 
Josh (open until closed again)@riley @BernieDoesIt The unitary executive theory is the most ridiculous anti-American lie.
@josh The way governments add departments over time tends to be, somebody finds (or invents) a missing government service, puts together a team, and lobbies for being made into a government department. The rise of the CFPB is a great recent example of the process. Sometimes, they can start whatever they think needs to be done first, and get converted into a government department later, as effectively happened when the Pinkertons became the FBI.
The notion of the new department being run by enthusiasts, and requiring some degree of independence to maintain that enthusiasm, is kind of implicit in the whole social contract behind the process. The primary response to the "unitary executive" nonsense should be threatening that all Darth Pumpkin's favourite teams will be eliminated — or appointed heads radically opposed to their purposes — at the first opportunity. Just imagine what ICE could do with its massive funding if its head believed in offering citizenship & integration services to any comer!
@riley @BernieDoesIt I agree with you, except that it would allow Trump even more control than he has already exercised.
With unitary executive, advise and consent clause goes out the window for congress. Congressional funding gets murky. Everything functions as “the executive branch”
@josh The revenge for breaking a social contract doesn't have to use the same bad techniques back. Taking Darth Pumpkin's graffiti off the Kennedy Centre could be done with an act of a future Congress instead of a unitarily executive fiat, for an example. (And I would really hope for the future Congress to flesh out a clear framework for agency independence for future reference.)
This is, of course, not a uniquely American problem. While European governments have, over time, grown the same way, the relatively frequent revolutions and other governmental reorgnisations have led to a number of originally quasi-independent agencies become parts of governmental cores, with a fairly common quasi-independency technique now being a separation between the political control personnel and the career civil servant personnel, typically headed by somebody with a title like a 'chancellor'. UK has had such a long time without revolutions that it now has a peculiar "quango" situation, however; it's rather messy, but really worth looking into if you care about different ways to approximate #GoodGovernance.
Oh, and throughout the Western world, the type of organisations with governmental recognition, some regulatory power, and the least direct governmental control are the descendants of old-time Zunfts or Guilds: professional self-governance bodies such as medical associations and bar associations. Also worth keeping in mind when you read about Florida's new effort to try and reduce the power of the state bar association, which is strongly protected against government take-over.
Curiously, while universities used to have self-governing powers rivalling those of the Great Zunfts in the mediæval times and well into 1800s, in some places even into 1900s, they have largely been stripped of them over the twentieth century, with the trend sharply accelerating after ca. 1960 or so.