Anarchism is stuck in a mid 20th century political paradigm. For many anarchists, Nazism remain the largest global political threat, and the baseline comparison for every authoritarian ideology is fascism. This explains why some of the most visible anarchist mobilisations in recent years were farcical "anti-fascist" street fights in places like Portland and Berkeley. It also explain why anarchists prioritise anti-semitism over things like anti-Palestinian racism, although they nominally oppose both. Jews are still seen as a marginalised group, even though they do not face discrimination on account of their ethno-religious identity in the West.

There's a noticeable absence of specifically anarchist mobilisation when it comes to Zionism and the American-Israeli war on Iran. Strangely, most of the war related discourse in anarchist circles targets Iran supporting tankies, who are politically irrelevant, instead of the US.

Today the state power in the West is wielded by conservatives, liberals and Zionists, all of whom are capitalist. "Nazi" is at best an inaccurate slur directed towards these groups. In the 21st century, Nazis are powerless and politically irrelevant, just like tankies.

Outside the West, there's more political diversity, including liberal democracies that veer between conservatism and liberalism, monarchies, dictatorships, one party technocracies and theocracies. However, there isn't anything closely resembling Nazi Germany. If anything, the closest examples are the Scandinavian states, because social democracy is the political economy of fascism.

There are, however, small and isolated Nazi movements in many countries, which anarchists choose to spend a disproportionate amount of time focusing on. One potential reason for this is the political irrelevancy of anarchism. The only way anarchists can exercise their own views is through inane street brawls. The squats of Exarchia have been cleared out, Freetown Christiania is a state sanctioned tourist attraction, and third world anarchist movements are run from US based anonymous Twitter accounts.

Anarchist thought, aside from left-wing market anarchism, is also stuck in the 20th century. In terms of political and economic theory, anarchism has stagnated, and the old guard is very much hostile to new ideas. To this day, market anarchists are seen as capitalists.

It really feels like anarchism is stuck in an epiphenomenal loop, where the struggles of the 20th century are played out over and over again. The same factions, the same fracturing of left-unity, and the same betrayals. It's all very boring and uninspiring.

@railing 🔥
this reminds me of Gilles Dauve on anti-fascism. Fascism succeeded in doing what it needed to do bringing the state under the reign of capital. There is no need to justify particular struggles by making a comparison to fascism when being against the state is supposed to be your baseline. Seems to me like picking small targets to seem "effective".

@railing i feel i disagree a bit on the fighting "nazis", anti-fascism etc, but i do feel like those small fights were done with the intention to stop the mainstream-ification of that shit and it's boiled over irrevocably now, so maybe i can't really say it matters?

i do feel "the movement" is utterly hollow and stuck in 20th century, can only speak about germany but people just do demo after demo with no end in sight.

@railing

at the same time i have no idea what would work to further anti-state objectives. and with the lwma stuff epspecially. i loved getting into all that stuff, im still pretty convinced of that world view, but i ultimately gave up playing with it because i couldn't see what it offered any different that the rest of these anarcho sub-identities.

like yeah ownership from use or whatever sound great as a economic principal but so what, we're all still stuck paying rent here in reality

@railing i have to laugh: i went to a nice discussion held after we watched a documentary about the spanish civil war and people were discussing how we're so far removed from any real power like that. in the end we discussed what movie to play next and there was (legit) concern about the germany copyright holder association potentially showing up to the movie and putting fines against the space if it contained music they have licenses on 🤣 we cant even pirate a damn movie!

@dantescanline Of course, I agree with the idea of fighting fascism, but American fascists don't hold any political power or pose any kind of threat (they were essentially larping). Moreover, the street fights only emboldened the far right and caused people to support their right to free speech. The entire thing backfired, but anarchists felt good about being able "punch Nazis."

I think furthering anti-state objectives would require anarchists to become less online and needlessly contrarian. It also means that anarchism needs to update it's priors and develop new ideas that resonate in this era. Zionism is the new nazism, and that's what Gen Z cares about. Anarchists ought to be confronting Zionists (who actually hold political power) in the streets and forming an anti-war movement. Instead, the focus seems to be on countering the tankie narrative. Just like the anti-fascist movement, it's an attempt to score cheap wins, while ignoring real and more entrenched power structures, namely the liberal democratic state.

Your anecdote about the movie is hilarious.

@railing oh weird i didnt get a notification for this reply, just seeing it now