Comrades, consider this social phenomenon: you are at a fellow youth's dwelling for a night of collective rest, and you engage in decadent bourgeois intimacy on the furniture. Suddenly, the patriarchal figure calls and instructs, "No, she prefers the other hand for such activities." You remark to the girl, "Your father is attempting to provide technical guidance on your exploitation." But she replies, "I have no father." This reveals a profound contradiction! Who was the voice on the telecommunication device?

Let us posit that you have adopted a reactionary and decadent stance. Let us say, hypothetically, that you have even engaged in anti-social behavior. Fine, and if you were such a deviant element, you would be subject to my base exploitation, correct? Then, speaking hypothetically, you would be my little vessel for filth. Now, let us also say you are a daughter of the patriarchal authority.

Now that we have established that you are both a deviant element and a daughter of the patriarchal authority, I believe you would agree with the collective when I say that you deserve a corrective struggle session. Am I not correct? A deviant element deserves to be disciplined, and as I represent the patriarchal authority, you are my subordinate, so I am the one who must administer the punishment.