baatliwalaWoman who wrote children's book about grief found guilty of murdering husband
Not that weird. Usually these types can’t shut the fuck about it.
The internet search history from Richins’s phone included “what is a lethal.dose.of.fetanayl” and “luxury prisons for the rich America”
Lmao
marighostThat’s interesting. On the surface one might assume she’s just dumb and doesn’t understand how to assess her finances, but I wonder if there’s more to it; maybe she already knew her net worth (or didn’t particularly care), but wanted to know what other people say her net worth is.
Ngl, if I had “people googling my net worth” money, I’d check at least once lol
She didn’t. She was in the hole $1.5M. There’s a whole series of fraud cases which are basically her singled-handed personal ponzi scheme of bad loans that are still pending trial.
What is it with these people? One thing is just never enough. If she had just killed her husband that’s fine, if he was just scamming people that’s fine, but honey if you can’t stick to one crime at a time you’re gonna get caught 👁️👄👁️💅🏾
They don’t think anything is their fault.
In her mind her husband was probably awful and abusive for not bailing out her 1.5million in debt.
I’ve dated women like this.
As a defense attorney I would’ve immediately declared my client mentally disabled and listed the search history as proof.
Good Lord. Pic of internet searches shown in court.
Midnight Wolf“how to tell the police that you totally did it and leave every trace imaginable, for ipohen”
joelfromausDo you mean an iphkne? Common mistake tbf.
quick_snailIs that an STD?
That would almost be as bad as writing a six page letter detailing all of your attempted witness tampering and accidentally having it found in your jail cell.
Which is a thing she did.
Look up the “Walk the dog” letter. It is one of the most unbelievably damning pieces of evidence you will ever see. The prosecution literally built their entire closing argument around it because it’s so bad that they can just discard the rest of their case and still win on that alone.
Never heard of this case before. Thank you for sharing, for anyone else I think this is a link to the letter mentioned:
For anyone who needs context, because on its face this is a confusing document, the actual letter was intended to be delivered to her mother. It conscripts said mother into a detailed scheme of witness tampering heavily involving her brother. Kouri concocts a fake history of drug use for her dead husband with numerous details designed to create reasonable doubt and open up the idea that her husband was a habitual fentanyl user, while explaining away the fact that no drugs were found in their home. She also implores her mother to send photos of her nieces to the press as an implicit threat against one of Eric’s sisters (Eric’s family were pretty firmly in the “She killed him” camp at this point). The large “Walk the dog!” heading, along with other notes throughout, is understood to be an instruction to get out of the house before reading the letter and then to dispose of it somewhere safely.
How do you be so stupid you think that people are reading the letter you sent from jail over the recipient’s shoulder but not before delivery
Yeah. In the letter she tells her mother to have this planned conversation with brother (to fill him in on his part of the cover-up) somewhere away from home because she’s worried about her mother’s house and phone being bugged. But she didn’t think “Hey, maybe I shouldn’t leave this highly incriminating document in my jail cell.” She is not a smart person, at all.
The wildest part about this case is that she really ought to have gotten away with it. The police absolutely botched the case. Kouri wasn’t even charged until something like a year or two after the murder. The initial investigation failed to gather any meaningful evidence, basically just completely shit the bed on everything, overlooked a whole bunch of red flags, and she was free and clear until Eric’s family hired a PI to look into it and get charges pressed.
The only reason she got convicted is that she’s spectacularly stupid and left a trail of evidence a mile wide, so that even a year or so after the fact it will still possible to easily show that she did it.
That’s the cops and criminals I’ve learned to expect
thethunderwolfcan youur husban.get pragnet from fentonall.pioiisoneng
Lmao I followed this trial start to finish but mainly listened to it in the background podcast-style so I didn’t see most of the closing slides. Didn’t realize how many typos were in those searches haha.
This is why you should always google really funny shit before committing a crime.
“How to not incriminate myself but make the query so funny that it shows up in the court docs”
“The suspect had a dozen copies of a 10hr looped video of a man shattering a jar in his anus on their phone.”
Have fun watching that, detective.
iPhind. Isn’t that from GTA5?