I asked emacs-devel: Are LLM contributions welcomed in GNU Emacs by the maintainers and contributors?

Eli Zaretskii:

We are awaiting the decision by the GNU Project on these matters, which will define the policy for all the GNU packages, and in the meantime we don't accept LLM-generated code, as a precaution.

For now, Emacs won't accept LLM contributions. However, given this:

Obviously, the right thing to do is protect computing freedom: share complete training inputs with every user of the LLM, together with the complete model, training configuration settings, and the accompanying software source code. Therefore, we urge Anthropic and other LLM developers that train models using huge datasets downloaded from the Internet to provide these LLMs to their users in freedom.

I sort of expect FSF, and therefore GNU along with Emacs, to be somewhat accepting of LLMs eventually, if they are "open". Too copyright-brained for their own good. Unfortunate.

#emacs

What is the policy/attitude towards LLM contributions in GNU Emacs?

@zyd vommit in Emacs scratch branch. Let's see how this goes
https://yhetil.org/emacs-devel/CALDnm5[email protected]/T/#t
Re: branch scratch/less-dubious-intern created (now 72596d17985)

@viz João Távora also maintains several important Emacs projects like eglot and sly (alternative to slime). I wonder to what extent he has contributed LLM generated code into either...

@zyd his multiple LSP middleman thingy in python has a fair bit of vommit

I'm slowly losing respect for a lot of these Emacs people...

@viz Same friend, same.