Why Are We Still Doing This?

Hi! If you like this piece and want to support my work, please subscribe to my premium newsletter. It’s $70 a year, or $7 a month, and in return you get a weekly newsletter that’s usually anywhere from 5000 to 185,000 words, including vast, extremely detailed analyses

Ed Zitron's Where's Your Ed At
This page bothered me with two popups and an ad above the content before I got to start reading.

He wants $7/mo to read hot takes like: "Anthropic turned $30 billion into $5 billion. That’s…bad. That’s just bad business."

Is this his first time looking into the tech industry?

Immediate close
Post Opus 4.5, this pundit who does not write software has concluded that the case for coding agents has gotten weaker, not stronger, to the point where we might as well declare the debate settled in his favor. It takes him 8,000 words to do so.
He uses financial numbers to back it up. What are SWE's using? The stock market?Is the DOW being 50k enough of a justification?
Oh. Sorry! I didn't realize he was using Financial Numbers to back it up.

> boosters are no longer allowed to explain what’s good about AI using the future tense. You can no longer say […]

I look forward to seeing how author think he’s going to enforce the rules he dreamed up for other people. Honestly wth

People need answers and decisions now, not in some magical future. The moment the stock dries on AI, suddenly "the future" won't be a good topic. Investors are cashing in on this whole economy as we speak.
"You're not allowed to tell me that the fledgling technology that has been getting steadily better for the past 3 years is likely to continue getting better." ...and there's my cue to close the window.
We've already seen signs that progress is slowing. Companies are so desperate to try and prove that this is linear or even expontial growth. But in reality it feels logarithmic.
My FAANG employer launched a service ~6 months ago that today seems millions of DAUs. This service was 100% vibe coded. This service was created 20x faster than the median launch, and had notably fewer issues than the median launch. If AI stopped improving today, it would be a technological leap equivalent to a new high-level language paradigm for us.