@onepict that is one reason, but another huge reason I see is just that so many devs have been trained to never think critically about their tools or industry to begin with. LLMs are just the shiny new toy, to be used without ever considering its impact on society, the way it redistributes power, or its long term legacy.
A huge amount of OSS people are not of the idealistic sort, they are of the "I'm apolitical and so is software, and humanities studies are worthless" sort.
@ainmosni @onepict The term “FOSS” probably has more to do with why we keep getting surprised by these sorts of things over and over again more than anything else.
The F and the OSS are very separate things.
It’s like looking at the Corporate Democrats or New Labour and wondering why they’re not progressive.
The only thing “open source software” and the people who build “open source software” care about is that the source is open. Literally just that. It’s open as in open for business and it’s always been that. Associating with free software has always been a whitewashing effort. And we seem to freely allow it to the detriment of the latter.
@ainmosni @aral I started out on the Open Source side and gradually moved over to the free software side.
Although at times I'm not sure either side fits anymore. Especially with the definition of freedom, and the desire to not acknowledge the political influences and ramifications of what we code and how we act within our communities.
I'm at a stage now where I distrust folks who are apolitical.