By far the largest
By far the largest
It’s totally in good faith when Israelis talk about how awful Hamas is on LGBT+ rights or when Americans do the same shit over Iran. You’re definitely not just carrying water for imperialism.
I’m sure the people whose struggle you’re so concerned about will thank you as they can’t afford bread due to sanctions and their family is eviscerated by bombs.
It’s funny how I’m not even talking about Hamas, which I don’t view as much of a state, and more of a militia operation? Ik they’re technically the elected government but?
I’m talking about large scale world governments specifically. I’m not condemning mostly powerless people struggling for their lives.
It’s the same mechanism. When you say “Actually Iran/Cuba/Venezuala/China/other place the US wants to starve and/or bomb is bad”, you’re just carrying water for imperialism. It’s genuinely more harmful than when the right tries to justify those actions because it tricks people who would otherwise support those people into supporting hostile actions against them in the name of opposing their government.
The grossest part is that the people making these assertions never know what they’re talking about and genuinely don’t care beyond its utility as hostile evidence. Showing some lemmitor who thinks Cuba hates gays or isn’t democratic their latest constitution doesn’t shock them that they’ve been mislead and result in any change in position, instead they just forget that bit of trivia and move on, sure they’re helping somebody by supporting America’s hostile actions against them.
Why don’t you take this opportunity to post evidence of common misconceptions for other readers? /gen
Maybe I’m coming around on China, it’s the only one of those I would disagree with. So try to dispel some of my opinions on the Ugyhur situation. I got banned from .ml last night so I didn’t get to finish my fun argument.
I lived in Urumqi for a few months (also met some Ugyhurs when I was living in Kazakhstan).
So try to dispel some of my opinions on the Ugyhur situation.
I can’t dispel them if I don’t know the specifics, but in general, what you hear in western media is either made up or taken wildly out of context.
Until the 2010s, there were significant issues with terrorism, with riots happening in Urumqi. There’s still a few glass panels you can see where it doesn’t quite match the rest of the underpass entrance or whatever. The government responded by 1. absolutely massive economic development projects, from wind farms to greenbelts and infrastructure, 2. Increased affirmative action, so a lot more Uhygurs were going to college in Beijing and Shanghai, and 3. sending basically anyone convicted of any crime to a job-training facility, the idea being that people who have jobs would be less disenfranchised and harder to radicalize. It was generally successful in that there’s been fewer terrorist attacks and a lot more economic development among the Ugyhur population, but 3 was unpopular enough they wound that down in the late 2010/early 2020s. Other measures to stop the terrorist attacks include hiring a shitton of police and security guards. Every mall, apartment building, and hotel has at least 1, sometimes 2 60 year old guards on their phones. They often can’t read or speak mandarin fluently.
Orthogonal to this there’s a sort of racist/patriarchal attitude you see from some Han people the government tries to address somewhat with anti-discrimination laws.
There’s a struggle in Xinjiang (and much of China) about how to bring intangible aspects of cultures into modernity, often it’s resolved through creating a commercialized version of the thing that can sustain itself in a market economy. I have mixed feelings here.
How can 3 be anything more than effectively being labor camps?
Because they’re primarily about training them for a job when they get out.
do you know someone personally that attests to whether they had a choice
I never actually met anyone who had been sent to one, and only a couple people even vaguely knew what I was talking about to explain more. To be clear I only know a handful of phrases in Uhygur and Mandarin, most of these conversations happened via google translate, often after a few drinks. I’d usually approach the subject by asking about history and how things have changed over their lifetime, proceeding to “There’s more police than anywhere else I’ve been in China” “did you hear what the western media is saying” and see what they felt like talking about.
Whether there were protections in place? Whether these were all fairly deemed “criminals”?
They were deemed criminals by the justice system. I have only slightly more faith in the Chinese justice system than other country’s, but 1. acab, obviously some innocent people got caught up, and 2. Petty crime shouldn’t result in people getting taken away from their family for months.
I think I saw someone use the figure 1million?
Yeah no any figures you see estimated by western media either comes from Adrien Zenz’s ass or redditors drawing red circles around random buildings on google earth.
There’s just no way that can be ethical, right?
It wasn’t, people were getting punished by spending months away from their family over petty crime. That’s why they stopped it.
I mean. According to who?
So it sounds like they were being over policed and didn’t really personally know the extent of it because they weren’t deemed criminals and weren’t directly affected?
Okay cool.
I got that figure from someone defending China over it iirc so I’m guessing it’s accurate if you don’t know offhand.
Okay so they stopped it? Does that mean I’m supposed to go back to trusting the government? How do you square that?
Additionally: if a significant portion of the population was imprisoned, especially systematically by race, held against their will, and people were dying as a result of that, I would say that is the beginnings of a genocide. Just like how America is currently perpetuating Black genocide imo. Even if they didn’t fully commit or succeed, I can’t just go back to trusting that system.
I mean. According to who?
The purpose of the program was to create people who can get jobs and be integrated into the economy. Making someone spend months doing hard labor isn’t useful for decreasing terrorism and increasing economic development.
So it sounds like they were being over policed
Yes
didn’t really personally know the extent of it
They mostly chalked it up to the crime and terrorism. They didn’t have much a response to “but it’s safe now, why are there still so many cops”.
Okay so they stopped it? Does that mean I’m supposed to go back to trusting the government? How do you square that?
Nobody said you should trust the Chinese government, I said you should not trust the US government or help them justify hostile action against foreign countries.
The Uhygur people have their own struggles, that are entirely alien to the stories cooked up in western media.
I got that figure from someone defending China over it iirc so I’m guessing it’s accurate if you don’t know offhand.
That’s 1 in 20 Uhygurs, I feel like it would have had a more pronounced effect and at that scale, I wouldn’t run into people who seemed to have no idea it happened.
people were dying as a result of that
I’m pretty confident that didn’t happen.
I do agree in general but it’s this view a bit simplistic?
There are many cases where this exact logic has been used to distract people and create infighting.
For example we can see the personal carbon footprint ad campaign sponsored by oil companies.
What does “and allies” encompass?
What does “murderous power structure” even mean?
Sources?
Yes the US is doing bad things. Human history is pretty much different groups taking turns doing the most murdering.
I’m not saying it’s a good thing, but can you show me a realistic path to stop it? Every time a power has fades in history, another one steps up to take its place.
Can you prove to me that the next one will be better than the one we have now?
Yeah basically came to say this
I don’t believe for a second anyone else would be better. They are currently just smaller.
If I had to guess on allies I would point to the coalition of Western European countries who routinely join US imperialist wars like the “war on terror” in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Id say the military industrial complex is a murderous power structure. If you want specifics look at the Pentagon, CIA, and carrots “defense” contractors such as Raytheon, Palantir, and so on.
IMO the path to stop it is something like anarcho- communism which you can start doing in your own neighborhood by forming collectives.
Agreed, but are you suggesting we sit back and enjoy? The only way to get over this stage is to call it out. Understand what is happening, create mechanisms that dissuade murderous psychopaths from positions of power.
For example, take money out of politics. As a politician you are not entitled to personal wealth. You have to give everything you have away and you live on minimum wage. End political donations etc etc.
The old good cop bad cop routine really works on you eh. Can’t see past it and you’re incapable of having a proper conversation about the issue. You get offended, you think it’s so obvious… I would kindly suggest that you look at the USA’s & allies’ foreign policy trajectory historically over the years. If you manage to look at the facts you will see that no matter which party is in power, the goals remain the same.
Watch how AOC and the like will not get elected and instead you will get a Newsom character running instead. Happened with Bernie and Hillary before and it will happen again.
Well aren’t you just a ball of positivity? 166 comments federating over to our instance, and only 16 net upvotes across them. And if you downvote more than twice as often as you upvote, then it really seems like you’re not getting much value out of this site. You might have a nicer time if you log off and go make some friends. You know, go bowling or play some video games. I think you’ll have more fun than arguing with people on the internet, which, uh, seems to be most of what you do here.
Oh, I thought you were referring to the electorate voting on candidates that were explicitly pro war with Iran.
As for how the two parties voted in the House of Representatives, I would argue that there is a clear material difference between one party voting 210-4 to reign in Trump’s war, and the other voting 215-2 to let Trump keep on bombing.
Painting all Democrats with the same brush is pretty ridiculous and disingenuous.
I notice you focus all your energy hating Democrats. That is fine, they suck.
I also notice you rarely bring up Republicans. This is not fine and shows you operate a lot like a Republican operative. So strange.
Oh please, fascism is a scale and they are not just the same. Did you forget that socialist and progressives are generally Democrats. It is gross, I know, because they are ruled by the Neoliberals.
That doesn’t change the reality that they are not the same.
I feel sorry for leftist desperately clinging onto Fascist China and Nazi Russian. What a sorry state their team is in.
I’ve met a lot of Iranians. None of them want to live in a theocracy. And none of them doubt for a minute that they’ve been executing protesters. Iranians themselves tend to be pretty secular people living under a bullshit theocracy.
Again, I have absolutely no love for the USA or Israel and absolutely despise trump. But don’t go round claiming Iran is anything other than an oppressive dictatorship.
A member of the irgc could literally tell you to your face “I have personally killed 10 children
They couldn’t tell me because they don’t do that. That’s factually americans and shitraelis.
My entire political identity is factually based on America bad, Israel bad.
You can’t argue with me because you can’t win on facts.
You don’t offer reason or facts only propaganda in return.
Now run