Mitchell HashimotoMar 16
It's so insanely disrespectful for an AI agent to talk to real people without consent or at least disclosure. This is the type of stuff I'm hugely supportive of government regulation. The FCC must expand the definition of robocalling and TCPA-style regulation to online AI.
Show threadSafigoMar 16
@mitchellh how robocalling rules are avoided by AI calls?
I’d assume robocall should include any call excluding direct communication between people
Show threadMitchell Hashimoto
@safigo Robocall only applies to telephone + text, I think in the age of AI the definition needs to expand to web interactions via AI.
Mar 16 at 6:14pmWeb
Show threadSafigoMar 16
@mitchellh it will be much harder, what part of web would you cover by those rules?
Show threadCassandrichMar 16
@safigo @mitchellh You can cover anything that falls under "doing business".
Show threadSafigoMar 16
@dalias @mitchellh ban AI without disclosure at all in web?
Actually it might be reasonable.
Show threadCassandrichMar 17
@safigo @mitchellh I mean I don't think you can reasonably do that on things that are not any business activity just people's own expression. Except by acknowledging that the existing LLM stop is all copyright infringement. But if someone made their own model that's not infringing and puts up its output as part of their blog or personal fiction or whatever, I don't see how you can justify forcing them to take it down.