ppurang. @eed3si9n As sbt 2 comes close to a release is it too late to try and move towards scala-cli like dependencies notation, i.e. instead of "com.casualmiracles" %% "treelog" % "1.9.5" using com.casualmiracles::treelog:1.9.5 ? I assume that newer folks will come from scala-cli to sbt so one less hurdle, also makes copy pasting things across simpler. Just a thought. And thanks once again for making sbt awesome and the good work. Can't wait for sbt 2 :)
∃ugene -Yokota 🥙@ppurang I think we can keep evolving sbt after 2.0, and we can try to do something like this for sbt 2.1? could you start a thread on https://github.com/sbt/sbt/discussions if you'd like to propose this as an idea?
@ppurang thanks!