[2026-03-16] Kulturmandag

https://feddit.dk/post/20366214

About Suicide and Suicide Safety Planning - Feddit.dk

Hey folks. It’s me, VubDapple. I’m a (not so active but still present) mod for this community and also a mental health professional. Recently there was some upset at this young community’s rule about posts concerning suicide. I thought I’d offer a few thoughts about suicide and where things seem to stand right now. Sorry for the delay in my response; things have been rather busy in my life. Suicide is a super frightening topic for many people - with good reason. As such, it is difficult to figure out how to manage discussion of suicide in a public and anonymous volunteer forum so that everyone’s needs are best met. A few issues come to mind that have to do with such balancing of needs: 1. How to balance the needs of people who want to discuss their suicidal thoughts against the needs of other people who would be triggered by reading it and would really like to avoid it? Suicidal ideation is really common within groups of people who self-identify as having mental health issues, so on the one hand it is reasonable to discuss it. On the other hand, the very nature of the topic feels dangerous to many, sometimes because it might trigger one’s own suicidal thoughts and at other times because there is concern that if not handled properly any discussion could make the issue worse rather than better. 2. How to know what the risk is that someone who is suicidal might actually attempt suicide? Many people who are suicidal are not in imminent danger, but some really are. Because this judgement is difficult to make, and because no one here including moderators is able to take on an actual care-giving clinical role, it is reasonable for us to treat all suicidal discussion as potentially dangerous. 3. How to best care for a suicidal person? This community is simply not able to provide any actual suicide prevention service! There is nothing like /r/suicidewatch here at this time! The community is not staffed to care for an acutely suicidal person. The recent rule adjustment (Rule #4) has been made to try to strike a balance between the competing needs of community members. Basically, it’s okay to acknowledge the existence of suicidal thoughts or thoughts relating to self-harm but we want to discourage extended discussion of such topics, precisely because no one here is able to take on an extended care-giving role in the manner a professional caregiver would and because there is a reasonable chance or at least reasonable concern that extended discussion might make things worse than they already are. The best advice that can be given at this time would be to seek professional mental health care. I can shed some light on how to know when suicidal thoughts are considered acutely and immediately dangerous and when they are not by providing the following psycho-educational information. Mental health professionals divided the universe of suicidal thoughts into “active” and “passive” categories. I like to offer the metaphor of a “poison flower” to help people recognize how these categories work. Suicidal thoughts are a developmental process that starts small and grows to become a threat. Think of a flower seedling - it is very small at first - just a shoot coming out of the soil. As it grows it develops tiny leaves and the stem gets larger, the leaves get larger, etc. in a developmental process. Eventually a bud forms, that bud opens and then we have a flower. The universe of passive suicidal ideation is just like this flower during its developmental phase eg., before the flower blooms. The universe of active suicidal ideation is like the flower after it has bloomed. Active suicidality is much more dangerous than passive suicidal ideation. Passive ideation usually starts with a feeling of overwhelm; a sense that a person simply does not have what it will take to manage the situation they find themselves in. As it grows, the passively suicidal person becomes aware of the thought that they might be better off dead. Often this thought is frightening at first; the people who experience it do not want it there and see it as a sign that they aren’t well. A further development of the suicidal process but still passive suicidality occurs when a person finds themselves fantasizing about how they might end their life. The thoughts may still be unwanted and at this phase of the developmental process there can be a sense of a growing struggle between the thoughts of dying and the desire to push those thoughts away. An even further development might occur when a person starts taking seriously the idea that they might actually kill themselves. At this late stage of passive suicidal ideation there may still not be what we call intent, but nevertheless the suicidal person may start researching how they would end their life. The turning point between passive and active suicidality comes when three criteria are met: 1) there is intent to harm one’s self, 2) there is a plan for how the person will harm themselves, and 3) the person has access to the means to harm themselves. The term intent means that the person has come to regard the idea of suicide as something they will carry out. The term plan means only that the person has picked a method for how they will die. You don’t need to have a “good” plan (eg., one likely to be lethal) in order for it to count that you have a plan; any plan will do. Finally having access to the means for committing suicide means having access to the tools and materials that the person would use to end their life. When all three of these criteria are met, we mental health professionals consider the person to be actively suicidal. When the criteria are not all met then we consider people to be more passively suicidal. Suicidal ideation is not a one-way process. People can move from not-suicidal to passively suicidal and then later to actively suicidal, but it is also true that actively suicidal people can exit their active suicidal status back usually to passively suicidal status, and then even later become not suicidal again. It’s important to keep this in mind because of what some call the “suicidal trance” eg., the tendency, as a person becomes more and more actively suicidal, to believe that suicide is the only reasonable response to what appears to that person at the moment to be an endless and entirely hopeless set of life problems from which suicide is the only escape. Most of the time it isn’t true that the person’s life problems are actually endlessly hopeless, but it does tend to feel that way when you’re in it. There is no hard and fast rule for assessing danger here, but the general idea is that passive suicidality is less acutely dangerous than active suicidality; mostly because with active suicidality by definition there is intent to die and the person’s energies are marshaled in the direction of finding a way to make that happen in a manner that is simply not the case when a person is more passively suicidal. Passive suicidality is dangerous in that it may become active later on, but most of the time when someone is passively suicidal they are not going to go home and kill themselves any time soon. Active suicidality is a crisis. The actively suicidal person needs help and they need it as quickly as it can be found. A good way to gain that help if there is no other resource around would be to go to a hospital emergency room and tell the staff there that you are actively suicidal. Such action might help best in the short term because at least in the USA (where I am located) the healthcare system is broken and there easily might not be follow up care provided which would be needed, but it might be better than nothing. What sort of care does a suicidal person benefit from? If you know of someone who is suicidal and the right solution is not immediate hospitalization to contain a crisis that will unfold very very shortly if urgent measures are not taken, then what is the right solution? It used to be the case that mental health professionals were trained to ask suicidal people to “sign a no-suicide contract” whether actually or metaphorically. It turns out that this doesn’t help much. These days, in addition to whatever therapy they may provide mental health professionals are trained to help passively suicidal clients by helping them complete a Suicide Safety Plan. The Suicide Safety Plan is simply a list of resources that the suicidal person can think about when they are tempted by the possibility of harming themselves. It is designed to help a suicidal person to maintain perspective about their larger situation even as the “suicidal trance” beckons them to die, and to remind the suicidal person of the techniques they can use or the resources they can call upon if they are feeling especially tempted. Anyone can make a Suicide Safety Plan by answering the following questions: 1) What are the warning signs in your behavior that signal that you are becoming increasingly suicidal? 2) What are the ways you have available to calm or sooth yourself that might lessen your need to suicide? 3) What can you do to make the environment safer for you (like getting rid of the means of harming yourself)? 4) What are reasons for living? Often this one boils down to “Who would be harmed if you were to die?” 5) Who in your personal life can you talk to about how bad things are? 6) Who are the healthcare professionals you can call on if things get really bad? I know what you might be thinking! A lot of people looking at these questions have told me that they can’t see it coming, they don’t know how to sooth themselves, there are no valid reasons for living, they have no friends or people who care about them and that they can’t access healthcare because it is too expensive (which is often true in the profit-obsessed USA unfortunately). Even so, it is worth trying to engage with these questions so as to write out methods and names and resources as well as you can. Even a little bit of hope and a little bit of planning in advance can become critical in a crisis, making the difference between life and death. A final word about reasons for living. Many times suicidal people have told me that even though they have children or loved ones, that their children will be better off without them alive. Such is the warping influence of the suicidal trance which commonly argues that the suicidal person is and can only be a burden and that children or loved ones will be better off without them. This simply isn’t true. Children get FUCKED UP when their parents commit suicide. Loved ones get FUCKED UP when their loved ones commit suicide. Particularly for children who lose their parents to suicide, the effect is to traumatize them rather permanently for the rest of their lives. I have seen it up close and personal. Nothing I might say can make the influence of the suicidal trance less strong, but at least hear me in that this part of what that trance says is a lie. Nothing good comes of suicide except maybe that your own personal pain is discharged. The others around you will suffer. If you don’t want to contribute to the suffering of others, please consider looking for another way. That other way might be very hard to find or very expensive to access, but when it is life or death, it’s a good investment to make. General Suicide Information https://www.cdc.gov/suicide/index.html [https://www.cdc.gov/suicide/index.html] Suicide Helplines In the USA: call or text 988 https://findahelpline.com/i/iasp [https://findahelpline.com/i/iasp] https://blog.opencounseling.com/suicide-hotlines/ [https://blog.opencounseling.com/suicide-hotlines/] Suicide Safety Planning: https://www.verywellmind.com/suicide-safety-plan-1067524 [https://www.verywellmind.com/suicide-safety-plan-1067524] https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-recovery-coach/202306/how-to-develop-a-safety-plan-to-manage-a-suicidal-crisis [https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-recovery-coach/202306/how-to-develop-a-safety-plan-to-manage-a-suicidal-crisis]

Det er underligt at tænke på, at en af de største tænkere i vor tid, Jürgen Habermas, forlod os netop nu, hvor hans idéer føles mere nødvendige end nogensinde. Han døde i en verden, der er ved at glemme, hvordan man taler sammen. Nu tænker du I sikkert, hvad har Harbermas med kulturen at gøre?

Meget for i alle dens former, kan det stadig være det sted, hvor vi genfinder evnen til at lytte, forstå og udfordre. Og Harbermas kæmpede for netop det. Habermas voksede op under nazismens mørke, og det prægede ham for livet. Han så, hvordan et samfund kan bryde sammen, når dialog erstattes af dogmer, og når magten ikke længere stilles til regnskab. Han troede på, at vi gennem sproget og den åbne samtale kunne skabe et rum, hvor alle - ‘uanset baggrund’ kunne mødes som ligeværdige. Det lyder måske naivt i en tid, hvor algoritmer og politiske strategier deler os op i lejre, der aldrig mødes. Men det er netop der, kulturen kommer ind i billedet.

Kunst, litteratur, musik, de er ikke bare underholdning. De er det sidste frie rum, hvor vi kan stille de spørgsmål, som politikken ikke tør. Hvor vi kan udfordre vores egne fordomme, møde den andens perspektiv og erkende, at verden sjældent er sort eller hvid. Habermas ville måske sige, at det er her, den kritiske tænkning begynder: I mødet med en bog, der ryster os, et maleri, der får os til at standse op, eller en sang, der giver ord til det, vi ikke selv kunne sige.

I dag ser vi, hvordan højrepopulismen vinder frem ved at udnytte frygt og vrede. Den lover enkle løsninger på komplekse problemer og skaber fjendebilleder, der skal forene ”os” mod ”dem”. Men kulturen kan bryde det mønster. Den kan mindes os om, at vi alle bærer historier, der er værd at høre, også dem, vi ikke er enige med. Den kan vise os, at demokratiet ikke bare er en stemmeseddel, men en måde at være sammen på.

Habermas troede på, at vi gennem dialog kunne nå frem til sandheden, eller i det mindste en fælles forståelse. Det kræver, at vi tør sige ”jeg ved det ikke” og lytte, når andre taler. Det kan kulturen træne os i: At se verden med nye øjne, at erkende vores egne begrænsninger og alligevel stå fast på, at der findes noget, der er større end os selv.

Måske er det der, vi skal starte. Ikke med at skriges ad, men med at fortælle historier. Historier om, hvem vi er, hvad vi frygter, og hvad vi håber på. For det er der, Habermas’ ånd lever videre: I det øjeblik, hvor vi vælger at mødes i stedet for at skubbe hinanden væk.

Jeg tænker Feddit.dk er et sted hvor det her faktisk lever, på trods af uenigheder, selvom vi kan være bedre, på begge sider.

Men for nu, tak for alt Jürgen Harbermas, hvil i fred.

Sp er der brevstemt, så jeg slipper for at skulle afsted på valgdagen, hvor jeg ikke får tid til at komme afsted. Husk at det kan nås helt indtil på fredag!

Har spillet The Roottrees Are Dead med konen. Det minder lidt om Return of the Obra Dinn, i den forstand at man skal finde ud af noget og man får information bekræftet efterhånden som man kommer videre. I Roottrees er det så bare familierelationer og internetsøgninger i 1998, frem for hvem der er død hvordan og hvornår på et skib i 1807 som i Obra Dinn.

Det kan anbefales! Sig gerne til hvis nogen kender lignende spil :)

The Roottrees are Dead on Steam

A genealogical mystery straight out of 1998. Scour the early Internet for clues, uncover hidden connections, and piece together the family tree behind the secretive Roottree Corporation.

Lyttede til Stephen King’s Carrie og den var faktisk bedre end jeg havde forestillet mig.

Har problemer med at logge ind på e-reolen så mit lydbogs-maraton er sat på pause, hvilket irriterer mig grænseløst. Den bliver ved med at sige at min login info er forkert, hvilket ikke er tilfældet. Har prøvet at af og geninstallere appen og det virker bare ikke så måske er appen bare nede ligenu. Suk. Synes i forvejen at det er en elendig app fordi den ofte ikke virker, ikke vil afspille bøgerne og skal genstartes eller bare lukkes ned resten af dagen fordi den går helt i hårdknude.

Vi så filmen Mass fra 2021 om lørdagen og jeg græd i næsten to timer, lol. Var fuldstændig udmattet til sidst. Den film håndterer så mange facetter af sorg på så autentisk en måde samtidig med at den berører et meget aktuelt problem i det amerikanske samfund og deres kultur. Jeg vil anbefale alle, der ønsker at se den, at de ikke læser noget om filmen først. Bare vid at det er to midaldrende par, der har en fælles fortid, som mødes i en kirke for at tale om noget, der skete for seks år siden. Mere behøver I ikke vide. Hav lommetørklæder klar, for I får brug for dem. Jeg slog mig endnu mere ud da vi så den i lørdags end da jeg så den første gang i 2021.