Mark DominusMar 13

A woman sues her insurance company for terminating her disability benefits. They reach a settlement and agree that the suit will be dismissed with prejudice.

She decides she doesn't like the settlement and asks her lawyers to reopen the case.They say they can't: it was dismissed, and in the settlement she agreed not to reopen the case.

She asks ChatGPT if her attorneys are lying to her. It says they are. She fires them and continues pro se, advised by ChatGPT.

CharGPT generates legal arguments for reopening the case, which she files, and 21 more motions, a subpoena, and eight other notices and statements, which she files.

The court denies her motion to reopen the case.

Advised by ChatGPT, she files a new suit against the insurance company and submits 44 more motions, memoranda, etc., which include citations to nonexistent cases.

Now the insurance company has sued OpenAI for tortious interference with their settlement contract.

🍿

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ilnd.496515/gov.uscourts.ilnd.496515.1.0_1.pdf

Show threadBill, organizer of stuffMar 15
@mjd The only use case for Generative AI is fraud.
Show threadMark DominusMar 15
@wcbdata That is demonstrably false.
Show threadBill, organizer of stuff
@mjd Try me. There isn't a use case for it that isn't, at its core, fraud.
Mar 15 at 11:42pmWeb
Show threadBill, organizer of stuffMar 15
@mjd Couldn't think of even one reasonable candidate in 15 minutes, even with your precious AI right there in front of you? I rest my case.