But you’re placing the entire lack of diverse opinions on the lack of trolls, which is wrong because it assigns all diverse opinions as troll opinions. Really I think you’re just answering a different question than OP asked to frame it as a positive for the fediverse, which doesn’t address the actual concerns. As you say, real life people are better at voicing different opinions, and this isn’t an ad-supported network, so where are the non-troll different opinions?

I also gotta disagree with the idea that the fediverse is adverse to “user number go up!” mentality, the most common response to me saying a post is off topic or low quality or something is “it doesn’t matter because we need more content to attract more users!”

Your first phrase says op places the Entire lack of diversity on the lack of trolls. That’s quite black and white view from your part IMO.

Sometimes we have the tankie trolls here on lemmy too, and sometimes back in the day I had good discussions on reddit, nothing is usually 100% or 0% in those cases

Your first phrase says op places the Entire lack of diversity on the lack of trolls

No, the person I replied to said that, they were replying to OP.

That’s quite black and white view from your part IMO.

If your answer to “where are the different opinions” is “no trolls,” then you are putting the lack of diversity on trolls. Which is black and white, yes, and why I disagree with it.

Sometimes we have the tankie trolls here on lemmy too

Which is why “no trolls” is a bad answer to OP’s question.