Shared whiteboard markers as synedoche for what happens when people don't take care of a shared common resource.
(No, I don't know why people don't throw out the markers that don't write, but they don't.)
I don't think it's inevitable, but I also have no idea what is going on in people's heads when they put the non-writing markers back on the whiteboard tray.

@yvonnezlam Oddly, I looked into this. I ran a co-working office in Madison for a decade and buildup of dry markers was a chronic nuisance. Ultimately I resolved it by just testing them all on the regular, but I did ask around and it came down to "I wasn't sure others wouldn't use it still" plus there wasn't a place to put it other than the trash πŸ—‘οΈ

Everyone had a personal standard for "this marker sucks" that they believed too strict, so they didn't want to trash markers good enough for others

@yvonnezlam so basically, people leave drying markers in the tray in an effort to be better people πŸ˜…

@gl33p @yvonnezlam Do you think the solution would be to give people a process for replacing markers with a fresh one?

... I can already imagine this would lead to complaints about wasting markers by replacing them too frequently. I think that's a separate problem though.

@LyallMorrison @gl33p I would adopt @gl33p's 2-pronged solution of testing markers regularly and providing spares, because no casual whiteboard user wants to deal with a more complicated process.

@yvonnezlam @LyallMorrison We often left a cup of good markers in each room, across from the whiteboard. So there was a tint friction around using a new one that biased people towards the ones at the board. But markers did thus flow through the workspace at a steady clip 🚰

The thing about common resources was that efficiency, in the sense of having just enough, tended to increase waste. Individuals would redundantly BYO items of uncertain availability, but would rely on things we kept abundant

@gl33p @LyallMorrison Once again, it turns out that systems work better when there's a certain amount of slack...

@gl33p @yvonnezlam While I'm pretty reliable about throwing out dry markers when I find them, I usually catch myself wondering if they're actually out of ink… or maybe there is some kind of disruption in a capillary chain that might be restarted, like with isopropyl alcohol?

I can imagine others having to overcome that friction of giving up hope of possible repair.

@gl33p In my own struggles with shared equipment, I've pretty much landed on, "someone is going to have to check this stuff on a regular basis and deal with the bits of shared gear that don't work. Or we continue to live in the hell where it looks like we have working gear but we really don't."
@gl33p There is definitely a similar dynamic of "someone else might be able to make it work, so who am I to say it doesn't?" For various reasons, I'd rather apply a strict standard of "it doesn't work" and let the few people who are inclined to dink with things to see if they can make them work do it at their own risk than pass the same piece of nonworking gear around for weeks.

@yvonnezlam πŸ’― emphatically agree - it's just so much lower interpersonal friction and better quality of outcome for most things to proactively and regularly check and stock all the things hotel snack fridge style

The other thing I did was get spares in advance for _everything else that wears out_ and store them right next to things. So there is always an unopened ream of paper, a toner cartridge, a fuser, next to each brother printer, and so forth

@gl33p @yvonnezlam I wonder if you had a dry marker rehydration bin labeled (actually trash) people would feel like they're doing a good thing rather than wasteful.
@axxl @gl33p Ooh, that would be a fun experiment...
@yvonnezlam @axxl β€œWe send them to a young couple in Middleton who refill markers and inkjet cartridges and stuff” 😁
@gl33p @yvonnezlam the equivalent of "they go to the marker farm up state"?

@axxl This got dark in a hurry!

(But I still laughed πŸ˜…)

@yvonnezlam